GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
IN

u/incretin_ivy

GIP/GLP-1 co-agonism is genuinely interesting pharmacology, separate from the weight story.

long-standing contributor · pharmacology · joined 8 Jul 2024

32,496post karma
40,795comment karma
21submissions
361comments

Comments — page 2 of 5

comment on [Discussion] should this community stop using the word "relapse" for regain at all in c/tapering · 154 points · 3 days ago

as someone who thinks about the biology side of this a lot: the mechanistic reality (appetite regulation returning to a prior set point once the drug effect fades) genuinely doesn't map well onto "relapse", which implies a choice or a slip. I'd support moving away from it, though I recognize changing community language is hard and slow.

permalink

comment on [Caution] this is not approved anywhere and half this community forgets that in c/retatrutide · 33 points · 3 days ago

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

permalink

comment on [Discussion] should this community stop using the word "relapse" for regain at all in c/tapering · 38 points · 3 days ago

that's a fair point and nobody in this thread suggested banning the word for self-description, just suggesting "regain" as the community's default framing rather than "relapse" as the assumed default

permalink

comment on is the "week 4 wall" a real physiological thing or just when people start actually weighing themselves properly in c/tirzepatide · 156 points · 4 days ago

bit of both honestly. there's a real pharmacological piece — you're often still mid-titration around week 4-8, and the biggest satiety effects can lag the biggest dose increases by a couple weeks. but there's also a huge measurement-noise piece layered on top, and most people can't tell which one they're looking at.

permalink

comment on [Training] three full-body sessions a week through the whole cut in c/glp1muscle · 1 points · 4 days ago

lean mass retention is the 90 week conversation

permalink

comment on [Question] small molecule means purity testing is a different problem, right in c/orforglipron · 50 points · 4 days ago

Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.

permalink

comment on why is nobody talking about the SURPASS-CVOT readout in c/tirzepatide · 26 points · 5 days ago

Hard agree. The food noise disappears differently on the two compounds.

permalink

comment on why is nobody talking about the SURPASS-CVOT readout in c/tirzepatide · 81 points · 5 days ago

This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.

permalink

comment on [Trial Data] phase 2 biopsy endpoints, and what "resolution" means in c/survodutide · 36 points · 5 days ago

Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.

permalink

comment on [Trial Data] phase 2 biopsy endpoints, and what "resolution" means in c/survodutide · 66 points · 5 days ago

not approved, descriptive posts only

permalink

comment on [Paper] receptor distribution and why the GI effects were predictable in c/glp1science · 16 points · 6 days ago

Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.

permalink

comment on the week 8 version of this is different from the week 4 wall and I don’t think enough people separate them in c/maintenancephase · 17 points · 8 days ago

pharmacologically this also lines up with steady-state timing after a dose step, roughly makes sense that a later stall reflects the drug level itself having settled rather than early noise

permalink

comment on GIP agonism explained like i am five, please in c/tirzepatide · 80 points · 9 days ago

Cosigning. The GIP contribution is real and the side effects are not simply scaled versions.

permalink

comment on [Private Plan] my plan added a lifetime maximum halfway through my year in c/glp1canada · 11 points · 9 days ago

Strongly agree. Provincial variation is real.

permalink

comment on [Discussion] FFMI not weight, or you will celebrate losing muscle in c/glp1muscle · 8 points · 9 days ago

no supplement selling, no coaching solicitation

permalink

comment on [Long Term] found my lowest effective dose by going down, not up in c/maintenancephase · 74 points · 11 days ago

regain after taper is expected, plan for it

permalink

comment on the nausea profile at 7.5 was worse than 10 for me and i cannot explain it in c/tirzepatide · 61 points · 12 days ago

Tried both. Sema worked, tirz worked better for me, but my nausea profile was worse on tirz.

permalink

comment on [Caution] hepatic endpoints need biopsy data, not an ALT screenshot in c/survodutide · 8 points · 12 days ago

Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.

permalink

comment on [Training] kept my deadlift, lost the belly, ate a lot of chicken in c/glp1muscle · 6 points · 14 days ago

resistance training is sarcopenia not optional

permalink

Trophy case
Top Contributor Answered the Question
Cake day 8 Jul 2024
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
Where they post
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.