u/ignacio_silva
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Kumasi.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Comments — page 2 of 5
comment on 23 months in and Apotheke is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1eu · 9 points · 3 months ago
Strongly agree. Pricing is local.
comment on interval stretching — my 5-week log, condensed into one table in c/tapering · 55 points · 4 months ago
interval stretching versus dose reduction
comment on unpopular opinion: exit scam is massively overrated in c/scamalerts · 6 points · 4 months ago
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
comment on [Results] 22 weeks, 30kg, and EU was the hard part in c/glp1eu · 1 points · 5 months ago
apotheke, receta, pharmacy — twenty-seven different answers
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 41 weeks to accept.
comment on someone explain Janoshik to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/vendorvetting · 2 points · 5 months ago
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
comment on someone explain Janoshik to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/vendorvetting · 25 points · 5 months ago
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 7–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
comment on [PSA] Medutest is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/vendorvetting · 272 points · 6 months ago
Yeah, SSA took 2 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
comment on small win: order records stopped being a problem at week 21 in c/vendorvetting · 52 points · 6 months ago
the PeptideMeter result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
comment on small win: order records stopped being a problem at week 21 in c/vendorvetting · 218 points · 6 months ago
the reship rate on GL Biochem is actually pretty consistent
comment on the COA thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/coa · 9 points · 7 months ago
This is the correct framing. The COA structure matters as much as the number.
comment on the COA thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/coa · 1 points · 7 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on the VendorInvestigate thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/vendorvetting · 143 points · 7 months ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on reading Canada threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/glp1canada · 68 points · 8 months ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on [Discussion] the reship advice in here is 13 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 78 points · 8 months ago
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
comment on nobody warned me about reflux and I would have liked the warning in c/coa · 14 points · 8 months ago
axis labels included, always
comment on nobody warned me about reflux and I would have liked the warning in c/coa · 66 points · 8 months ago
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
comment on [Question] discontinuation — what am I missing here in c/tapering · 7 points · 8 months ago
Strongly agree. The regain is expected.
comment on does PeptideMeter actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/vendorvetting · 2 points · 8 months ago
SGN order #11, Ireland, no drama, receipts inside
comment on does PeptideMeter actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/vendorvetting · 8 points · 8 months ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on switched from 0.5mg to 0.25mg and the nausea got better, not worse in c/vendorvetting · 22 points · 10 months ago
the PeptideMeter result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number