GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
HS

u/hsa_math

Pre-tax dollars change the real cost by a third. Do the arithmetic.

member · joined 2 Aug 2024

7,039post karma
3,575comment karma
3submissions
38comments

Comments — page 2 of 2

comment on help me understand endpoint, I have read the wiki twice in c/trialwatch · 122 points · 12 months ago

press release SURMOUNT posts must be flaired until a publication exists

permalink

comment on pricing: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/glp1uk · 40 points · 1 year ago

The tier 3 pathway in my area: 16 month wait, then 4 months for review, then approved. Total MHRA.

permalink

comment on week 51 check-in — 46kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/orforglipron · 85 points · 1 year ago

oral non-peptide agonist is ACHIEVE, no food restrictions

permalink

comment on [Discussion] the ACHIEVE advice in here is 11 years out of date in c/orforglipron · 18 points · 1 year ago

My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.

permalink

comment on NHS vs UK — genuinely asking which matters more in c/glp1uk · 19 points · 1 year ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

permalink

comment on my triglycerides moved and I cannot work out whether FLOW is why in c/trialwatch · 55 points · 1 year ago

What was the dropout rate?

permalink

comment on [Results] 27 weeks, 41kg, and endpoint was the hard part in c/trialwatch · 47 points · 1 year ago

event rates are more informative than hazard ratios alone

permalink

comment on ATTAIN: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/orforglipron · 6 points · 2 years ago

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

permalink

comment on genuine question about TRIUMPH that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/trialwatch · 172 points · 2 years ago

Phase 2 TRIUMPH looked amazing. Phase 3 trials are harder. Do not anchor on phase 2 readouts.

permalink

comment on [Vendor] WXT order #17 — the Netherlands, 9 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/glp1uk · 609 points · 2 years ago

say which nation, England, Scotland, Wales, NI differ

permalink

comment on reading FLOW threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/trialwatch · 50 points · 2 years ago

STEP, SURMOUNT, SURPASS, SELECT, FLOW, TRIUMPH — read the appendix

permalink

comment on [Results] 77 weeks, 21kg, and endpoint was the hard part in c/trialwatch · 33 points · 2 years ago

phase 2 is not phase 3, smaller n and shorter trial

permalink

comment on week 16 check-in — 46kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 2 years ago

phase 2 is not phase 3, smaller n and shorter trial

permalink

comment on [Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on UK in c/glp1uk · 13 points · 2 years ago

Boots stock is hit-and-miss by location

permalink

comment on someone explain endpoint to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/trialwatch · 65 points · 2 years ago

dropout handling matters, especially on GI-heavy populations

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

permalink

comment on someone explain endpoint to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/trialwatch · 40 points · 2 years ago

Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.

permalink

comment on someone explain endpoint to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/trialwatch · 34 points · 2 years ago

Strongly agree. Phase 2 is investigational, not conclusive.

permalink

comment on am I the only one who found SURMOUNT harder than the injections in c/trialwatch · -19 points · 2 years ago

event rates are more informative than hazard ratios alone

permalink

Trophy case
Top Contributor
Cake day 2 Aug 2024
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
Where they post
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.