Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking reship against triglycerides for 9 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is…
u/honest_syringe19
Keeping a private log and a public opinion.
member · joined 16 May 2026
Overview — page 2 of 5
comment on VendorInvestigate: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/vendorvetting · 50 points · 3 months ago
Correct.
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on stalled for 3 weeks at 2.4mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/intlshipping · 1 points · 4 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 17 weeks, not 19. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [Results] 81 weeks on 2.4mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/insurancefights · 2 points · 4 months ago
External review overturned the denial. Took 7 weeks but the process exists.
comment on [Results] 81 weeks on 2.4mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/insurancefights · 4 points · 4 months ago
denial reason codes matter, ask for the actual code
comment on [Results] 81 weeks on 2.4mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/insurancefights · 3 points · 4 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
Right, the formulary question again, but with numbers this time. I have 6 data points over 10 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance,…
comment on tracking — 11 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/dosinglogs · 27 points · 4 months ago
Genuine question — what concentration were you at?
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for dose history posts in c/dosinglogs · -16 points · 5 months ago
You have restated the marketing copy.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring vendor at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 37 points · 5 months ago
CPC took 2 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
comment on [Discussion] order records is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/vendorvetting · 80 points · 5 months ago
the batch number or it did not happen
comment on VendorInvestigate is the most under-discussed thing in c/bpc157 in c/vendorvetting · 104 points · 5 months ago
the reship rate on BCH is actually pretty consistent
comment on VendorInvestigate is the most under-discussed thing in c/bpc157 in c/vendorvetting · -35 points · 5 months ago
Tested 10 batches from MKM over 18 weeks. The consistency is the signal. They claim 98, they deliver 98.
comment on VendorInvestigate is the most under-discussed thing in c/bpc157 in c/vendorvetting · 164 points · 6 months ago
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
Right, the testing question again, but with numbers this time. I have 20 data points over 14 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance,…
comment on reading external review threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/insurancefights · 9 points · 6 months ago
This is correct. Appeal letters work.
comment on week 41 check-in — 21kg down, injection-site soreness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/insurancefights · 16 points · 6 months ago
Which state? Coverage varies.
comment on [PSA] Medutest is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/vendorvetting · 20 points · 6 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring waist at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/dosinglogs · 0 points · 7 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring waist at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/dosinglogs · 0 points · 7 months ago
The injection-site soreness was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.