942
three years of rules threads, summarised so you do not have to read them
Confession thread, sort of. I went from 0.5mg to 12.5mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 18 weeks…
u/hedda_aguirre
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Dhaka.
member · joined 14 May 2025
4,283post karma
3,790comment karma
7submissions
90comments
Overview — page 2 of 5
comment on Denmark: co-agonism, and what it actually costs here in c/cagrilintide · 2 points · 2 months ago
the mechanism is different, the side effect profile reflects it
comment on [Question] copay — what am I missing here in c/insurancefights · 2 points · 2 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 99.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on stalled for 20 weeks at 1.7mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/cagrilintide · 8 points · 2 months ago
research use only, no human protocols in posts
comment on three years of lowest effective dose threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/maintenancephase · 2 points · 3 months ago
the lowest dose you can stay on is not the lowest dose that works
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring PeptideMeter at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/labresults · 68 points · 3 months ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about private plan until somebody posts a number in c/glp1canada · 13 points · 3 months ago
special authorization is the cross-province difference
comment on [Results] 21 weeks on 1.0mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/cagrilintide · 16 points · 3 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 99.1, not 93.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on [Question] PeptideMeter — what am I missing here in c/labresults · -2 points · 3 months ago
Is that 98.1% area or mass?
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about wiki until somebody posts a number in c/meta · 1 points · 4 months ago
Second this question. I have wondered about meta for 15 months and never seen a straight answer.
comment on my ALT moved and I cannot work out whether long term is why in c/maintenancephase · 22 points · 4 months ago
nobody posts about this part and it is the longest part
comment on reading CagriSema threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/cagrilintide · -9 points · 5 months ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on week 21 check-in — 37kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/insurancefights · 65 points · 5 months ago
denial reason codes matter, ask for the actual code
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring wiki at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/meta · 57 points · 5 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on three years of rules threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/meta · 1 points · 5 months ago
Week 26 for me and the honest summary is: 22kg down, fatigue manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
comment on three years of rules threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/meta · 78 points · 5 months ago
sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly
comment on week 51 check-in — 42kg down, constipation manageable, one thing confusing me in c/glp1canada · 26 points · 5 months ago
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for co-agonism posts in c/cagrilintide · 24 points · 6 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on three years of test results threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/labresults · 331 points · 6 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 19 weeks, not 5. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on is it normal to get nausea at week 64 in c/insurancefights · 31 points · 6 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.