Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Rosario.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
Overview — page 2 of 2
comment on [Lab] SGN survo — VendorInvestigate came back 99.0% against a claimed 99.1% in c/survodutide · 108 points · 9 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on co-agonism — my 6-week log, condensed into one table in c/cagrilintide · 27 points · 11 months ago
Yeah, amylin is doing different work than GLP-1.
comment on someone explain cagrilintide to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 1 year ago
the co-agonism question is real and interesting
comment on reading 15mg threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/tirzepatide · 20 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, dual agonism does produce a different appetite profile than GLP-1 alone.
comment on three years of REDEFINE threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/cagrilintide · 8 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. The co-agonism is real.
comment on [Results] 52 weeks, 25kg, and dual agonist was the hard part in c/survodutide · 3 points · 1 year ago
the heart rate signal is real in the data
comment on week 71 check-in — 17kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/tirzepatide · 82 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, dual agonism does produce a different appetite profile than GLP-1 alone.
comment on cagrilintide — my 24-week log, condensed into one table in c/cagrilintide · 4 points · 1 year ago
tendon and cagrilintide literature in rodents is interesting
comment on genuine question about glucagon that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/survodutide · 51 points · 2 years ago
the safety profile is not just tirzepatide amplified
comment on 19 months in and hepatic fat is still the thing I get wrong in c/survodutide · 20 points · 2 years ago
Crossposting this to c/t2dglp1 because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on [Lab] split one vial across VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter — 98.0% and 99.0% in c/tirzepatide · 1 points · 2 years ago
Hard agree. The food noise disappears differently on the two compounds.
comment on [Lab] split one vial across VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter — 98.0% and 99.0% in c/tirzepatide · 1 points · 2 years ago
Vial-splitting is on-topic here. Do not ask about pen-cracking, that goes in c/reconstitution.
comment on [Lab] split one vial across VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter — 98.0% and 99.0% in c/tirzepatide · -13 points · 2 years ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
Right, the Mounjaro question again, but with numbers this time. I have 19 data points over 24 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance,…
comment on 24 months in and SURPASS is still the thing I get wrong in c/tirzepatide · 128 points · 2 years ago
This matches the trial data. SURMOUNT-1 was 96.2% body weight at 11 weeks.
No trophies yet. Most accounts here never get one.
Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.
sigmaaldrich.comSeveral compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.
Reference