205
[Discussion] FFMI not weight, or you will celebrate losing muscle
Week 46 update. 37kg down from the start, early fullness basically gone since about week 3. Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I…
u/hamza_zielinski
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Osijek.
member · joined 16 Jul 2025
3,539post karma
2,031comment karma
2submissions
16comments
comment on [Discussion] FFMI not weight, or you will celebrate losing muscle in c/glp1muscle · 4 points · 9 days ago
FFMI tracking requires body composition
comment on intent-to-treat vs per-protocol explains half the arguments on this site in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 11 days ago
Not to be pedantic but hazard ratio and FLOW are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on [Results] 12 weeks, 35kg, and FLOW was the hard part in c/trialwatch · 6 points · 1 months ago
number-needed-to-treat is the house dialect
comment on SELECT: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/trialwatch · 27 points · 2 months ago
off-label use data is different from approved-indication data
comment on [Results] 62 weeks, 45kg, and FLOW was the hard part in c/trialwatch · 243 points · 4 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on three years of protein threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1muscle · 113 points · 8 months ago
Genuine question — what concentration were you at?
comment on genuine question about DEXA that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1muscle · 3 points · 1 year ago
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #20 — France, 9 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/trialwatch · 30 points · 1 year ago
press release TRIUMPH posts must be flaired until a publication exists
comment on three years of SELECT threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/trialwatch · 0 points · 1 year ago
number-needed-to-treat is the house dialect
comment on am I the only one who found SELECT harder than the injections in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 1 year ago
SURMOUNT-4 discontinuation arm showed regain. That is the reality of a chronic disease treatment, not a failure.
comment on am I the only one who found SELECT harder than the injections in c/trialwatch · 65 points · 1 year ago
STEP 1 readout: 98.6% mean weight loss, absolute numbers matter. Spread around that mean is enormous.
comment on am I the only one who found SELECT harder than the injections in c/trialwatch · 253 points · 1 year ago
SELECT reported a SURPASS hazard ratio but the absolute event rate is what changes clinical practice.
3k
am I the only one who found SELECT harder than the injections
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: FLOW matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have…
comment on [Discussion] the SURPASS advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/trialwatch · 4 points · 1 year ago
give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body
comment on [Discussion] the SURPASS advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/trialwatch · 7 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.
comment on genuine question about TRIUMPH that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/trialwatch · 37 points · 2 years ago
SURMOUNT-4 discontinuation arm showed regain. That is the reality of a chronic disease treatment, not a failure.
comment on reading FLOW threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/trialwatch · 184 points · 2 years ago
STEP, SURMOUNT, SURPASS, SELECT, FLOW, TRIUMPH — read the appendix