0
[Discussion] can we stop arguing about A1c until somebody posts a number
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 7.5mg, week 70, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable —…
u/gustav_cardoso
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Trondheim.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
5,766post karma
5,934comment karma
3submissions
59comments
Overview — page 2 of 4
comment on [Results] 46 weeks on 10mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/labresults · 306 points · 7 months ago
yep. 35 weeks in, same.
comment on [Results] 52 weeks, 35kg, and bloodwork was the hard part in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 7 months ago
HOMA-IR is crude but free and useful for tracking
comment on timeframe: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/progresspics · 1 points · 7 months ago
the community is deliberately image-free
comment on goal — my 15-week log, condensed into one table in c/progresspics · 61 points · 8 months ago
This is correct. Process matters more than the number.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #23 — Canada, 13 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/labresults · 170 points · 9 months ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on is it normal to get constipation at week 30 in c/compounding · 7 points · 10 months ago
API source questions are on-topic and compounders dodging them is newsworthy
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about A1c until somebody posts a number in c/bloodwork · 0 points · 11 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 99.2, not 99.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on [Question] Ireland — has anyone got a straight answer on API source in c/compounding · 64 points · 1 year ago
API source questions are on-topic and compounders dodging them is newsworthy
comment on tried A1c for 9 weeks. here is what happened. in c/bloodwork · 26 points · 1 year ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on [Question] timeframe — what am I missing here in c/progresspics · 0 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. NSV counts.
comment on [Results] 61 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/bloodwork · 97 points · 1 year ago
TSH from 15 to 35 is movement, not noise
comment on [Results] 61 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/bloodwork · 245 points · 1 year ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on [Discussion] telehealth is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/compounding · 1 points · 1 year ago
no pharmacy referral codes, naming is fine, recruiting is not
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether batch is why in c/labresults · 125 points · 1 year ago
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
comment on does below spec actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/labresults · 60 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, the PeptideMeter number matching the claim is the actual signal.
comment on compounding — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/compounding · 81 points · 1 year ago
This is correct.
Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 99.0% on the same vial is normal.
comment on 22 months in and timeframe is still the thing I get wrong in c/progresspics · 9 points · 1 year ago
text removes the comparison trap
comment on [PSA] test results is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/labresults · 15 points · 1 year ago
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
comment on Janoshik is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects in c/labresults · 13 points · 1 year ago
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body