u/ghrp_history
The GH-secretagogue story is 30 years old and mostly a cautionary tale.
member · joined 25 May 2024
Comments — page 2 of 4
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for certificate of analysis posts in c/coa · 290 points · 3 months ago
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
comment on [Results] 31 weeks on 1.7mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/customs · 45 points · 4 months ago
This is correct. State your country always.
comment on [Results] 31 weeks on 1.7mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/customs · 15 points · 4 months ago
seizure letters: redact everything identifying
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring Janoshik at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 74 points · 4 months ago
How many orders from SWB is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.
comment on water content — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/coa · 123 points · 4 months ago
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
comment on [Question] import — what am I missing here in c/customs · 15 points · 4 months ago
seizure letters: redact everything identifying
comment on stalled for 21 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/vendorvetting · 51 points · 4 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on certificate of analysis — my 17-week log, condensed into one table in c/coa · 34 points · 6 months ago
the related substances line is where the story is
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Lab] SGN BPC — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2% in c/coa · 140 points · 6 months ago
Water content on the document? That affects your concentration math.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for SURMOUNT posts in c/tirzepatide · 19 points · 6 months ago
the GIP side does different things than the GLP-1 side, that is the point
comment on help me understand exit scam, I have read the wiki twice in c/scamalerts · 265 points · 6 months ago
sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions
comment on the declared value thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/customs · 2 points · 7 months ago
Strongly agree. Jurisdiction matters.
comment on the declared value thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/customs · 5 points · 7 months ago
no advice on evading inspection or misdeclaring
comment on the declared value thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/customs · 1 points · 7 months ago
Yeah, Denmark rules are not global.
comment on the declared value thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/customs · 3 points · 7 months ago
personal-import allowances differ by country
comment on SURPASS — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/tirzepatide · 2 points · 7 months ago
The SURMOUNT readouts are real but less consistent than STEP. Some people plateau earlier on tirz.
comment on SURPASS — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/tirzepatide · 7 points · 7 months ago
Tried both. Sema worked, tirz worked better for me, but my reflux profile was worse on tirz.
comment on SURPASS — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/tirzepatide · 1 points · 8 months ago
the 15mg is the top of the pen, not the required dose
comment on [Discussion] the seizure advice in here is 22 years out of date in c/customs · 60 points · 8 months ago
Which country? Rules vary.
comment on nobody warned me about reflux and I would have liked the warning in c/coa · 1 points · 8 months ago
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.