u/gas_fee_grump

counterpoint on the $5 test specifically: on some chains the test costs more in gas than the crypto discount you are chasing. at that point pay by card and stop optimising.

pricing is mid-range for what you get. not the cheapest, not close to the most expensive.

competitive pricing on the higher-strength vials is the other thing worth knowing about them.

pricing sits below the shanghai vendors for comparable material, which is presumably what you are paying for with the email latency.

and on some chains the $5 test costs more in gas than the discount you are chasing, at which point pay by card and stop optimising.

pentadecapeptide is sequence, the supply chain naming is a mess

I am going to push back on this slightly.

You have restated the marketing copy.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

BPC pentadecapeptide is a naming problem, three things are called this

handlers in the community are rare and cautious

the sequence literature looks promising but rodent-only

pentadecapeptide is sequence, the supply chain naming is a mess

regulatory status changed in 10 countries, check yours

near-zero controlled human data, full stop

Came off after 23 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.

the sequence literature looks promising but rodent-only

handlers in the community are rare and cautious

The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.

regulatory status changed in 6 countries, check yours