u/formulary_fighter
Read the formulary exclusion list before you read the marketing.
long-standing contributor · appeals · joined 25 Jan 2024
Comments — page 2 of 5
comment on [Paper] amylin co-agonism is genuinely different pharmacology, not just more GLP-1 in c/glp1science · 61 points · 17 days ago
Which paper are you quoting?
comment on [PSA] semaglutide salt forms are not the same molecule as semaglutide in c/compounding · 29 points · 17 days ago
no pharmacy referral codes, naming is fine, recruiting is not
comment on [Win] HSA dollars changed the real cost by a third and i nearly missed it in c/insurancefights · 38 points · 18 days ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on unpopular opinion: dose history is massively overrated in c/dosinglogs · 3 points · 26 days ago
Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on genuine question about protein that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1muscle · 1 points · 27 days ago
Not to be pedantic but resistance training and protein are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on genuine question about protein that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1muscle · 133 points · 28 days ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on province — my 19-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1canada · 1 points · 28 days ago
name your province, coverage is provincial
comment on biased agonism: real, interesting, almost certainly irrelevant to your dose in c/glp1science · 6 points · 28 days ago
cite the paper: journal, year, first author, links optional
comment on unpopular opinion: step therapy is massively overrated in c/insurancefights · 3 points · 1 months ago
Which plan type? prior authorization is different.
comment on [Discussion] the lean mass advice in here is 19 years out of date in c/glp1muscle · 15 points · 1 months ago
DEXA is the real measurement
comment on [Discussion] the lean mass advice in here is 19 years out of date in c/glp1muscle · 21 points · 1 months ago
bathroom BIA scales are not a method
comment on half-life — my 3-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1science · 1 points · 1 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about external review until somebody posts a number in c/insurancefights · 10 points · 1 months ago
Did you get step therapy or outright denial?
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about external review until somebody posts a number in c/insurancefights · 2 points · 1 months ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on 17 months in and Canada is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1canada · 36 points · 1 months ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on [Results] 92 weeks, 10kg, and special authorization was the hard part in c/glp1canada · 21 points · 1 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on [Discussion] the copay advice in here is 4 years out of date in c/insurancefights · 9 points · 1 months ago
the carve-out clause varies by employer
comment on the prior authorization question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/insurancefights · 8 points · 1 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on the prior authorization question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/insurancefights · 193 points · 1 months ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on 9 months in and jurisdiction is still the thing I get wrong in c/customs · 1 points · 2 months ago
Stalled for 15 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 91.