GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
FI

u/first_hundred

Member #63. The c/coa rules were my idea and I regret nothing.

long-standing contributor · joined 19 Aug 2023

9,412post karma
10,815comment karma
7submissions
95comments

Comments — page 2 of 5

comment on what changed for me between week 30 and week 73 in c/coa · 19 points · 2 months ago

Slight fix: the number was 99.1, not 96.8. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

permalink

comment on [Question] method development — what am I missing here in c/hplc · 6 points · 3 months ago

Did they post the raw trace or just the summary?

permalink

comment on endpoint — my 2-week log, condensed into one table in c/trialwatch · 18 points · 3 months ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

permalink

comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for certificate of analysis posts in c/coa · 49 points · 3 months ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

permalink

comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for certificate of analysis posts in c/coa · 28 points · 3 months ago

Tested the GLB raw material and a reseller vial side-by-side. Same purity claim, different impurity profiles. Handling matters.

permalink

comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for certificate of analysis posts in c/coa · 86 points · 3 months ago

Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.

permalink

comment on [Results] 42 weeks, 21kg, and purity was the hard part in c/coa · -3 points · 3 months ago

Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.

permalink

comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on certificate of analysis in c/coa · 8 points · 3 months ago

the counterion is part of the mass you paid for

permalink

comment on [Meta] the FLOW rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/trialwatch · 2 points · 4 months ago

Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

permalink

comment on [Meta] the FLOW rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/trialwatch · 4 points · 4 months ago

Phase 2 TRIUMPH looked amazing. Phase 3 trials are harder. Do not anchor on phase 2 readouts.

permalink

comment on [Meta] the FLOW rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/trialwatch · 5 points · 4 months ago

the relative risk reduction in headlines is not the whole story

permalink

comment on COA: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/coa · -11 points · 4 months ago

no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are

permalink

comment on [Results] 62 weeks, 45kg, and FLOW was the hard part in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 4 months ago

press release STEP posts must be flaired until a publication exists

Adding to this: SURMOUNT is doing more work than the comment implies.

permalink

comment on water content — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/coa · 104 points · 4 months ago

Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.

permalink

comment on anyone else notice endpoint kicking in around week 19 in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 4 months ago

the relative risk reduction in headlines is not the whole story

Adding to this: hazard ratio is doing more work than the comment implies.

permalink

comment on the LC-MS question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/hplc · 1 points · 5 months ago

Not to be pedantic but method development and integration are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

permalink

comment on nobody warned me about nausea and I would have liked the warning in c/coa · 567 points · 5 months ago

Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.

permalink

comment on [Vendor] WXT order #6 — the Netherlands, 31 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/trialwatch · 85 points · 5 months ago

Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.

permalink

comment on [Lab] SGN BPC — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2% in c/coa · 364 points · 6 months ago

the counterion is part of the mass you paid for

permalink

comment on the Netherlands: purity, and what it actually costs here in c/hplc · 83 points · 6 months ago

integration decision on a shoulder changes your number by half a point on its own

permalink

Trophy case
First Thousand 100 COAs Read
Cake day 19 Aug 2023
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
Where they post
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.