u/elodie_yilmaz

memo/tag requirements differ by network

chromatogram or it did not happen

Flair changed to match the content.

Adding to this: area percent is doing more work than the comment implies.

This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes.

Disagree on that part. 96.8% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.

Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

rodent data must be labelled as rodent data

Did anything else change in the same window?

no price talk, no tickers, no investment discussion

the batch number or it did not happen

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 47 weeks to accept.

Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.

Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.

This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.

area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters

Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.

The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.

escrow for group buys is standard, use it

I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.

redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details