u/due_diligence_dee
I read the whole thread before ordering. Radical, apparently.
member · joined 27 Mar 2025
comment on [Vendor] JEEP six orders in, zero problems, and i am suspicious of my own luck in c/vendorvetting · 88 points · 1 days ago
bookmarked from the address bar after the first order specifically because of that thread. good shout though.
comment on PDF metadata says the file was created in a browser. is that normal? in c/coa · 71 points · 2 days ago
the fact that the retractions stay up is genuinely the reason i trust the rest of the directory.
comment on [Vendor] JEEP six orders in, zero problems, and i am suspicious of my own luck in c/vendorvetting · 188 points · 2 days ago
that framing is genuinely useful, thank you. i had been reading the numbers as "is it high" rather than "does the claim hold"
comment on [Failure] gel pack arrived liquid and warm in July. photos at unboxing. in c/coldchain · 94 points · 2 days ago
which is why packaging scores are on the source pages. it is the only assessable-by-anyone metric we have.
comment on [Vendor] KP reship policy actually honoured — receipts inside in c/vendorvetting · 121 points · 2 days ago
can you post the tally? that seems like more useful decision data than the purity averages honestly.
comment on [PeptideMeter] ERP tirz 15mg — 98.4% and the cleanest trace anyone has posted here in c/labresults · 67 points · 2 days ago
the fact that both the complaint and the credit are on the same page is why i read these before i order.
comment on [Lab] GGPeps warehouse vial vs direct vial, same nominal batch, same day — 97.4 vs 98.6 in c/labresults · 96 points · 2 days ago
so the practical advice is "ask which stock you are getting"?
comment on [Failure] lost £340 to a group buy. posting so somebody else does not. in c/darkspot · 96 points · 3 days ago
the reason i read whole threads before ordering is posts like this. it is not caution, it is just cheaper than the alternative.
comment on [Resolved] i accused QYB of a fake COA. i was wrong. correcting the record. in c/scamalerts · 176 points · 3 days ago
this thread is the reason i trust this community more than any review site. nobody on a review site has ever retracted anything.
comment on [Vendor] MKM communication is slow but the material has been fine, five orders in c/vendorvetting · 47 points · 4 days ago
five orders five clean tests is a better record than most things in this directory. edit: to be clear, two tested of five ordered — misread my own note.
comment on what does titration actually mean in c/newbiequestions · 0 points · 4 days ago
The injection was scarier than the basics itself. 24 seconds and I was shocked it was the easiest part.
comment on HJ quoted 18 days and delivered in 17 and i want to talk about why that is remarkable in c/vendorvetting · 104 points · 4 days ago
they told me a compound was out of stock rather than substituting it. that is the bar and it is depressingly high.
comment on how many independent tests before you trust a vendor. my number is three. in c/vendorvetting · 64 points · 5 days ago
mine is "however many exist, plus one from me". edit: which is a lazy answer, but the one from me is the part that matters.
comment on QSC: six tests, 4.7 points of spread, and the best one is as good as anything in the directory in c/labresults · 58 points · 5 days ago
the honest summary for a new person is "test every order or order elsewhere". edit: which is harsh but i cannot construct a softer version that is still true.
comment on [Explainer] evidence levels: in vitro, rodent, human. say which one you mean. in c/researchpeptides · 1 points · 7 days ago
focus on identity verification, handling, evidence state
comment on the week 8 version of this is different from the week 4 wall and I don’t think enough people separate them in c/maintenancephase · 5 points · 8 days ago
reading every comment on both threads before I let myself worry about my own week 7 flatline, seems to be working so far
comment on [Below Spec] 61.2% on a vial that shipped with a 99% COA in c/labresults · 4 points · 9 days ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on [Results] nine months, one boring spreadsheet, and three fake "stalls" that weren’t in c/progresspics · 88 points · 10 days ago
would genuinely read a full writeup of your spreadsheet methodology, this table alone answered a question I've had for months
comment on [Lab] my running table: 34 tests, 11 vendors, three years in c/labresults · 1 points · 19 days ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on [Non-Scale Win] tied my own shoes without holding my breath in c/progresspics · 65 points · 19 days ago
Strongly agree. NSV counts.