u/divya_bakken
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Bilbao.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
Overview — page 2 of 2
comment on small win: PDF metadata stopped being a problem at week 40 in c/scamalerts · 116 points · 9 months ago
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
comment on is it normal to get fatigue at week 90 in c/retatrutide · 130 points · 9 months ago
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder
comment on PDF metadata — my 11-week log, condensed into one table in c/scamalerts · 15 points · 9 months ago
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
comment on switched from 0.5mg to 2.4mg and the the food-noise thing got better, not worse in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 11 months ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on Germany: exit scam, and what it actually costs here in c/scamalerts · 30 points · 1 year ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
comment on someone explain glucagon to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/retatrutide · 16 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on triple agonist — 9 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/retatrutide · 234 points · 1 year ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on three years of fake COA threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/scamalerts · 39 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
comment on switched from 2.5mg to 10mg and the early fullness got better, not worse in c/retatrutide · 232 points · 1 year ago
nobody should be giving this to anyone without extensive monitoring
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on dose escalation in c/retatrutide · 82 points · 1 year ago
the dosing is steep, the constipation reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet
comment on someone explain moderation to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/meta · 8 points · 1 year ago
rules, moderation, ranking, wiki
comment on [PSA] TRIUMPH is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/retatrutide · 44 points · 1 year ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with glucagon, not with what you concluded.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for glucagon posts in c/retatrutide · -7 points · 1 year ago
retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions
comment on the disclosure thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/meta · 0 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on week 86 check-in — 11kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me in c/meta · 86 points · 2 years ago
Genuine question — what concentration were you at?
comment on [Discussion] rules is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/meta · -28 points · 2 years ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on fraud — 23 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/scamalerts · 35 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
comment on fraud — 23 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/scamalerts · 266 points · 2 years ago
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
comment on tried meta for 20 weeks. here is what happened. in c/meta · 10 points · 2 years ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on 5 months in and dose escalation is still the thing I get wrong in c/retatrutide · 18 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.