u/deleted_my_history
Nuked my old comments. Starting again with better habits.
member · joined 2 Oct 2024
comment on [Question] small molecule means purity testing is a different problem, right in c/orforglipron · 47 points · 5 days ago
small molecule, not a peptide, purity discussion is different
comment on [Speculation] what happens to the research-peptide supply chain if this lands in c/orforglipron · 8 points · 7 days ago
Came off after 32 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
comment on [Seizure] third one in two years. the pattern is the carrier, not the country. in c/customs · 1 points · 8 days ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on [Question] how do you verify identity when there is no reference standard in c/researchpeptides · 15 points · 9 days ago
research use only, handling and analysis, not administration
comment on [Paper] ACHIEVE-1 glycaemic data vs the injectables in c/orforglipron · 54 points · 10 days ago
The nausea was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on three years of glucagon threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/survodutide · 49 points · 17 days ago
Phase 11 or 23?
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring personal import at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/customs · 1 points · 28 days ago
the 20mg import allowance is Canada-specific
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring personal import at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/customs · -19 points · 29 days ago
The the food-noise thing was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on anyone else notice research peptides kicking in around week 9 in c/researchpeptides · 3 points · 1 months ago
thymosin fragments, GH secretagogues, thymosin, long tail
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring personal import at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/customs · 53 points · 1 months ago
The constipation was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether identity is why in c/researchpeptides · 39 points · 1 months ago
Genuine question — what concentration were you at?
comment on retatrutide vs TRIUMPH — genuinely asking which matters more in c/retatrutide · 90 points · 1 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on [Meta] the small molecule rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/orforglipron · 10 points · 2 months ago
Second this question. I have wondered about orforglipron for 9 months and never seen a straight answer.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #24 — Germany, 21 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/retatrutide · 62 points · 2 months ago
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder
comment on phase 2 — my 13-week log, condensed into one table in c/retatrutide · 67 points · 2 months ago
TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 97.4% weight loss but the constipation profile on the highest arm was rough. Phase 2 != phase 3.
comment on phase 2 — my 13-week log, condensed into one table in c/retatrutide · 57 points · 2 months ago
TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 99.3% weight loss but the reflux profile on the highest arm was rough. Phase 2 != phase 3.
comment on phase 2 — my 13-week log, condensed into one table in c/retatrutide · 79 points · 2 months ago
nobody should be giving this to anyone without extensive monitoring
comment on someone explain thymosin to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/researchpeptides · 73 points · 3 months ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
comment on ATTAIN — 3 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/orforglipron · 7 points · 3 months ago
Has anyone actually got this in writing, or is it forum lore at this point?
comment on [Meta] the dual agonist rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/survodutide · 22 points · 3 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.