u/dario_petrescu

Not to be pedantic but disclosure and meta are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 57 weeks to accept.

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

reimbursement costs in the UK this month

Mechanistically the bit that matters is disclosure. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?

Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.

sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

Week 52 for me and the honest summary is: 7kg down, reflux manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.

Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.

EMA notices are different from national ones

Crossposting this to c/bpc157 because the people who need it are not reading this community.

Slight fix: the number was 95.1, not 94.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

rules, moderation, ranking, wiki

Maintenance for 12 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.

Week 91 for me and the honest summary is: 37kg down, early fullness manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.

Came off after 9 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule

Strongly agree. Pricing is local.