u/dario_petrescu
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Verona.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
comment on [Discussion] are the c/vendorvetting evidence rules too strict (no) in c/meta · 10 points · 5 days ago
moderation appeals go through modmail first
comment on [Country] SE/NO/DK — Norway is the outlier and not in a good way in c/glp1eu · 9 points · 9 days ago
tag your country in the title, bare EU gets a template
comment on [Country] SE/NO/DK — Norway is the outlier and not in a good way in c/glp1eu · 5 points · 9 days ago
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.
comment on [Country] SE/NO/DK — Norway is the outlier and not in a good way in c/glp1eu · 12 points · 9 days ago
The constipation was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on [Long Term] found my lowest effective dose by going down, not up in c/maintenancephase · 27 points · 10 days ago
food noise returns but not always immediately
comment on [Discussion] "EU rules" is almost always a national question wearing a European hat in c/glp1eu · 8 points · 16 days ago
Which country? Rules differ.
comment on [Vendor] JEEP six orders in, zero problems, and i am suspicious of my own luck in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 16 days ago
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
comment on [Discussion] we have no vocabulary for success that is not a number going down in c/maintenancephase · 14 points · 17 days ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on [Discussion] should c/progresspics stay text-only forever (yes) in c/meta · 5 points · 19 days ago
Strongly agree. Transparency wins.
comment on why do vendor accounts always have the same three typos in c/vendorvetting · 13 points · 25 days ago
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
comment on goal weight — 18 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/maintenancephase · 0 points · 1 months ago
Regain on a taper is expected. 18% back over 12 weeks, which matches the discontinuation data. Planned for it.
comment on why does nobody talk about prescription in c/glp1eu · 1 points · 3 months ago
This is correct. Tag your country.
comment on [Results] 22 weeks, 45kg, and maintenance was the hard part in c/maintenancephase · 64 points · 3 months ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for moderation posts in c/meta · 1 points · 4 months ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on why does nobody talk about testing in c/vendorvetting · 128 points · 4 months ago
Ordered from SGN, got the vial, tested it myself via VendorInvestigate, and it held the claim. Order fulfilled.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring vendor at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 5 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on three years of rules threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/meta · 26 points · 5 months ago
Strongly agree. Transparency wins.
comment on unpopular opinion: moderation is massively overrated in c/meta · 4 points · 6 months ago
This is correct. Modmail first.
comment on small win: order records stopped being a problem at week 21 in c/vendorvetting · 91 points · 6 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on ranking: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/meta · 1 points · 6 months ago
Not to be pedantic but disclosure and meta are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 57 weeks to accept.