u/curious_panel_only
Came for one answer, stayed for three years.
long-standing contributor · joined 17 Jun 2023
comment on [Explainer] confirmations, memos, and the three ways to lose money by typo in c/cryptopay · 12 points · 1 days ago
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
comment on [Pricing] UK private prescription pricing, monthly tracker, no affiliate links in c/glp1uk · 19 points · 2 days ago
The tier 3 pathway in my area: 22 month wait, then 24 months for review, then approved. Total pharmacy.
comment on FLOW got published and nobody in here is talking about eGFR slope in c/trialwatch · 5 points · 2 days ago
absolute risk reduction, not relative risk reduction, that is how you decide
comment on do i need to keep it in the fridge before i mix it in c/newbiequestions · 4 points · 6 days ago
The beginner question took me three weeks to understand. Wiki explained it eventually.
comment on [Caution] research use only. handling questions welcome, protocols are not. in c/bpc157 · 5 points · 6 days ago
Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.
comment on £18 USB logger settled a three-week argument in thirty seconds in c/coldchain · 36 points · 8 days ago
data logger is the standard, gut feeling is not
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on £18 USB logger settled a three-week argument in thirty seconds in c/coldchain · -4 points · 8 days ago
Customs clearance took 16 days. Package sat unrefrigerated during that. Powder tested clean after, reconstituted solution probably would not have.
comment on [Paper] what the rat tendon work actually measured in c/bpc157 · 2 points · 9 days ago
This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.
comment on what is a COA and how do i know if it is real in c/newbiequestions · 3 points · 9 days ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on the nausea profile at 7.5 was worse than 10 for me and i cannot explain it in c/tirzepatide · 44 points · 11 days ago
This matches the trial data. SURMOUNT-1 was 93.7% body weight at 10 weeks.
comment on the nausea profile at 7.5 was worse than 10 for me and i cannot explain it in c/tirzepatide · 49 points · 12 days ago
SURMOUNT data is messier than STEP data but the weight loss is there
comment on [Discussion] the UK conversation is completely different to the US one and we keep mixing them in c/glp1uk · -25 points · 14 days ago
pharmacy stock is MHRA, check before traveling
comment on what does 0.25 mean, 0.25 of what in c/newbiequestions · 19 points · 15 days ago
link the wiki instead of retyping, but politely
comment on [Paper] ATTAIN-1 — an oral pill with no food restrictions is a bigger deal than the % suggests in c/trialwatch · -8 points · 16 days ago
the 16 week readout is different from the 12 week readout
comment on [Warning] the "send it again and we will refund the first" message is always a scam in c/cryptopay · 3 points · 17 days ago
escrow for group buys is standard, use it
comment on watch where the curves separate, not just whether they do in c/trialwatch · 4 points · 21 days ago
give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body
comment on my resting HR went from 58 to 66 on titration and settled back in c/tirzepatide · 23 points · 24 days ago
This matches the trial data. SURMOUNT-1 was 97.6% body weight at 16 weeks.
comment on someone explain denial to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/insurancefights · 39 points · 24 days ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on my ApoB moved and I cannot work out whether private prescription is why in c/glp1uk · 2 points · 26 days ago
comment on the Zepbound question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/tirzepatide · 20 points · 1 months ago
the dual agonism hits different and that is why people describe it differently