u/crosspost_bot_no
Not a bot. Just crosspost a lot. There is a difference.
member · joined 15 Feb 2025
Comments — page 3 of 5
comment on what changed for me between week 65 and week 19 in c/tirzepatide · 9 points · 4 months ago
Switched from sema at 2.5mg to tirz at 5mg. Different drugs, cannot compare the doses directly.
comment on three years of hepatic fat threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/survodutide · 16 points · 5 months ago
comment on reading purity threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/hplc · 25 points · 5 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on anyone else notice survodutide kicking in around week 9 in c/survodutide · 10 points · 5 months ago
glucagon injection is a different vector than GLP-1
comment on private prescription vs tier 3 — genuinely asking which matters more in c/glp1uk · 11 points · 5 months ago
NHS tier 3 is MHRA, the waiting list is real
comment on [Question] chromatogram — what am I missing here in c/hplc · 15 points · 5 months ago
chromatogram or it did not happen
comment on [Results] 87 weeks, 46kg, and MHRA was the hard part in c/glp1uk · 54 points · 6 months ago
the tier 3 pathway is the only free route, it is slow
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring tirzepatide at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/tirzepatide · 1 points · 6 months ago
Cosigning.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 2 weeks to accept.
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on integration in c/hplc · 236 points · 6 months ago
Injection volume and flow rate? Those affect resolution.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #14 — Germany, 27 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/glp1uk · 5 points · 6 months ago
private prescription routes vary by region
comment on help me understand MASH, I have read the wiki twice in c/survodutide · 17 points · 6 months ago
Phase 24 or 40?
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 0.5mg and the injection-site soreness got better, not worse in c/maintenancephase · 6 points · 6 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 23 weeks, not 25.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 91 weeks to accept.
comment on [Results] 46 weeks on 1.7mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/cagrilintide · 25 points · 6 months ago
[removed by moderator]
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 0.5mg and the injection-site soreness got better, not worse in c/maintenancephase · 29 points · 6 months ago
Strongly agree.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on anyone else notice 15mg kicking in around week 24 in c/tirzepatide · 220 points · 8 months ago
the appetite change on tirz is more than just reduced hunger, it is different machinery
comment on survodutide vs glucagon — genuinely asking which matters more in c/survodutide · 20 points · 8 months ago
Yeah, glucagon co-agonism is genuinely different.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 77 weeks to accept.
comment on [Question] purity — what am I missing here in c/hplc · 38 points · 8 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 23 weeks, not 27. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on small win: triple agonist stopped being a problem at week 61 in c/retatrutide · 50 points · 8 months ago
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
comment on retatrutide vs triple agonist — genuinely asking which matters more in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 8 months ago
retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions
Adding to this: TRIUMPH is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on Denmark: dual agonist, and what it actually costs here in c/survodutide · 26 points · 9 months ago
Yeah, glucagon co-agonism is genuinely different.