u/cold_chromatogram31
Here for the tables, not the takes.
member · joined 26 Nov 2025
Comments — page 3 of 5
comment on small win: fake COA stopped being a problem at week 55 in c/scamalerts · 50 points · 5 months ago
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
comment on the SURPASS question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/trialwatch · 65 points · 5 months ago
Not to be pedantic but FLOW and endpoint are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on unpopular opinion: telehealth is massively overrated in c/compounding · 10 points · 5 months ago
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 7–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
comment on PDF metadata: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/scamalerts · 0 points · 6 months ago
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
comment on PDF metadata: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/scamalerts · 18 points · 6 months ago
The VendorInvestigate results I got back showed 98.1% but CPC claimed 98.4%. Same vial, two services. I posted the receipts.
comment on PDF metadata: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/scamalerts · -15 points · 6 months ago
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
comment on anyone else notice bloodwork kicking in around week 75 in c/bloodwork · 14 points · 6 months ago
Crossposting this to c/reconstitution because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on genuine question about SELECT that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 6 months ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on tried STEP for 14 weeks. here is what happened. in c/trialwatch · 23 points · 7 months ago
Strongly agree. Phase 2 is investigational, not conclusive.
comment on [Question] ALT — what am I missing here in c/bloodwork · 15 points · 8 months ago
What are your reference ranges?
comment on fake COA: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/scamalerts · 122 points · 8 months ago
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on help me understand seizure, I have read the wiki twice in c/customs · 250 points · 9 months ago
Crossposting this to c/cryptopay because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on [Question] API source — what am I missing here in c/compounding · 8 points · 9 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 12 weeks, not 14. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on cloned site — 3 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/scamalerts · 19 points · 10 months ago
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
comment on is it normal to get constipation at week 30 in c/compounding · 34 points · 10 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for customs posts in c/customs · -25 points · 10 months ago
declared value is customs, impacts duty
comment on help me understand endpoint, I have read the wiki twice in c/trialwatch · 616 points · 12 months ago
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 18–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
comment on [Question] Ireland — has anyone got a straight answer on API source in c/compounding · 72 points · 1 year ago
API source questions are on-topic and compounders dodging them is newsworthy
comment on small win: TRIUMPH stopped being a problem at week 45 in c/trialwatch · 15 points · 1 year ago
absolute risk reduction, not relative risk reduction, that is how you decide
comment on three years of hazard ratio threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/trialwatch · 114 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Phase 2 is investigational, not conclusive.