u/coa_janitor
c/coa mod. If your COA screenshot is cropped above the batch number I will ask you to repost it.
moderator · mod · c/coa · joined 2 Nov 2023
Comments — page 2 of 5
comment on [Lab] LC-MS confirmed identity but the UV purity is 94%. now what in c/hplc · 24 points · 16 days ago
co-elution is real and HPLC is usually not enough to resolve it
comment on [Vendor] JEEP six orders in, zero problems, and i am suspicious of my own luck in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 19 days ago
Ordered from SWB, got the vial, tested it myself via VendorInvestigate, and it held the claim. Order fulfilled.
comment on retention time shifted 0.4 min and nobody wants to talk about it in c/hplc · 170 points · 20 days ago
two labs, two different baselines, two different purity numbers, both honest
comment on domain registered eleven days ago, 400 five-star reviews. sure in c/vendorvetting · 13 points · 21 days ago
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
comment on [Suspicious] the same signature image on COAs from three vendors in c/coa · 1 points · 23 days ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
comment on [Discussion] we talk about dose like it is a score and it is not in c/semaglutide · 1 points · 23 days ago
my A1c moved before the scale did and i nearly missed it
comment on [Below Spec] 88% is not "basically fine" and i am tired of that reply in c/labresults · 105 points · 24 days ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on [Discussion] we talk about dose like it is a score and it is not in c/semaglutide · 10 points · 24 days ago
Week 21 for me and the honest summary is: 14kg down, muscle cramps manageable, and the quiet happened around week 3.
comment on [Discussion] we talk about dose like it is a score and it is not in c/semaglutide · 33 points · 25 days ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on the appetite return question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/tapering · 9 points · 25 days ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with tapering, not with what you concluded.
comment on interval stretching is the most under-discussed thing in c/t2dglp1 in c/tapering · -4 points · 1 months ago
Did anything else change in the same window?
comment on interval stretching is the most under-discussed thing in c/t2dglp1 in c/tapering · 79 points · 1 months ago
Strongly agree.
Adding to this: regain is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on interval stretching is the most under-discussed thing in c/t2dglp1 in c/tapering · 16 points · 1 months ago
Stalled for 22 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 27.
comment on [Medutest] SWB sema — 98.2%, cold chain intact, 9 days transit in c/labresults · 8 points · 1 months ago
multiple batches from QYB show a spread, that is the data
Adding to this: Medutest is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Medutest] SWB sema — 98.2%, cold chain intact, 9 days transit in c/labresults · 12 points · 1 months ago
Is that 99.0% area or mass?
Disagree on that part. 96.8% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about batch in c/coa · 36 points · 1 months ago
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about batch in c/coa · 114 points · 1 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on [PeptideMeter] ERP tirz 15mg — 98.4% and a very clean trace in c/labresults · 7 points · 1 months ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
comment on reading gas fees threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/cryptopay · 81 points · 1 months ago
What was the gas and did it matter?
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Lab] four vendors, same compound, same week, one test each in c/labresults · 31 points · 1 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.