u/chain_confirm_c
Confirmations, memos, and why the wrong network is the most expensive typo in this hobby.
long-standing contributor · payments · joined 14 Jan 2024
comment on [TGA] the 2024 compounding rule change closed a whole access route overnight in c/glp1aus · 5 points · 2 days ago
the Denmark versus Denmark distinction is real
comment on [Caution] stacking with a sulfonylurea is a real hypo risk, not a theoretical one in c/t2dglp1 · 41 points · 2 days ago
CGM traces tell a story, numbers alone do not
comment on [Warning] wrong network. $180 gone. test with $5 first. in c/cryptopay · 118 points · 2 days ago
both, and only one of them is within your control this afternoon.
comment on [Caution] stacking with a sulfonylurea is a real hypo risk, not a theoretical one in c/t2dglp1 · 1 points · 3 days ago
Yeah, glycaemic control is the original use.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 59 weeks to accept.
comment on [Warning] wrong network. $180 gone. test with $5 first. in c/cryptopay · 334 points · 3 days ago
Sorry, genuinely. This is the most common irreversible mistake in the whole space and it is not a knowledge failure — everyone in this thread knows the chains are different. It is an attention failure, and the fix has to be procedural rather than cognitive.
My procedure, for whatever it is worth: paste address, confirm network in the wallet UI out loud, send $5, wait for the vendor to confirm receipt on their side, then send the balance. It has caught one error in two years, which paid for every $5 test I have ever done many times over.
comment on [Discussion] are the c/vendorvetting evidence rules too strict (no) in c/meta · 1 points · 3 days ago
the wiki is the source
comment on [Results] came off deliberately over four months, regained 4kg not 24 in c/tapering · 9 points · 4 days ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on [Method] the gradient everyone uses for sema and why it under-resolves the des-amido in c/hplc · 63 points · 4 days ago
Yeah, the chromatogram profile matters more than the headline number.
comment on [Discussion] are the c/vendorvetting evidence rules too strict (no) in c/meta · 11 points · 4 days ago
Strongly agree.
Adding to this: disclosure is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Question] NZ unfunded means full price. is anyone actually paying that. in c/glp1aus · 3 points · 5 days ago
Strongly agree. AU and NZ differ.
comment on [Question] NZ unfunded means full price. is anyone actually paying that. in c/glp1aus · 4 points · 5 days ago
PBS/TGA claims need the notice or schedule entry
comment on [Discussion] are the c/vendorvetting evidence rules too strict (no) in c/meta · 1 points · 6 days ago
This is correct. Modmail first.
comment on [PSA] the "send it again and we will refund the first" message is always a scam in c/scamalerts · 378 points · 6 days ago
The chain is the arbiter and it is public. That is the entire point of it.
If your transaction has the confirmations the vendor's own checkout asked for, you have discharged your obligation and the rest is their reconciliation problem. Every version of this scam depends on you not checking, or on you feeling too awkward to say "I have checked and it confirmed at 14:22".
comment on [Discussion] restarting is not failing and we should say that louder in c/tapering · 11 points · 13 days ago
no shaming people who restart
comment on [Warning] the "send it again and we will refund the first" message is always a scam in c/cryptopay · 11 points · 17 days ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on chargeback is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects in c/cryptopay · 25 points · 26 days ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on someone explain chromatogram to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/hplc · 12 points · 1 months ago
This is the correct method framing. Column and gradient are load-bearing fields.
comment on someone explain chromatogram to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/hplc · 9 points · 1 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on someone explain chromatogram to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/hplc · 44 points · 1 months ago
axis labels included, always
comment on why does nobody talk about confirmations in c/cryptopay · 18 points · 1 months ago
the 24% discount versus 33% network fees