u/cato_batista
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Haarlem.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
Comments — page 3 of 5
comment on anyone else notice packaging kicking in around week 49 in c/coldchain · 121 points · 6 months ago
Yeah, data logger is the only acceptable proof.
comment on Denmark: ACHIEVE, and what it actually costs here in c/orforglipron · 67 points · 7 months ago
oral non-peptide agonist is ACHIEVE, no food restrictions
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring EU at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/glp1eu · 1 points · 7 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on [Discussion] the MASH advice in here is 3 years out of date in c/survodutide · 13 points · 7 months ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on is it normal to get constipation at week 14 in c/orforglipron · 68 points · 7 months ago
phase 3 data is interesting, phase 23 will tell the real story
comment on three years of week one threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/newbiequestions · 29 points · 7 months ago
saved.
Disagree on that part. 99.0% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on anyone else notice small molecule kicking in around week 59 in c/orforglipron · 1 points · 8 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on [Question] milestone — what am I missing here in c/progresspics · 18 points · 8 months ago
comment on [Results] 96 weeks on 0.25mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/newbiequestions · 24 points · 8 months ago
what is a COA — certificate of analysis, document from the lab
comment on 20 months in and half-life is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1science · 0 points · 9 months ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on small win: packaging stopped being a problem at week 66 in c/coldchain · 13 points · 9 months ago
a warm courier van is a bigger problem for a mixed vial than for dry powder
comment on small win: packaging stopped being a problem at week 66 in c/coldchain · 32 points · 9 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on small win: packaging stopped being a problem at week 66 in c/coldchain · -7 points · 9 months ago
Strongly agree. Peak temperature is not the whole story.
comment on small win: packaging stopped being a problem at week 66 in c/coldchain · 166 points · 9 months ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is excursion.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for packaging posts in c/coldchain · 19 points · 9 months ago
Which carrier and route?
comment on the timeframe thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/progresspics · 12 points · 10 months ago
text removes the comparison trap
comment on week one: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/newbiequestions · 1 points · 10 months ago
what is bac water — bacteriostatic water, preservative included
comment on ice pack: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/coldchain · 8 points · 11 months ago
okay but what dose
Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 96.8% on the same vial is normal.
comment on anyone else notice dual agonist kicking in around week 80 in c/survodutide · 13 points · 11 months ago
the MASH indication changes the risk calculus
comment on [Results] 16 weeks on 0.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/newbiequestions · 10 points · 11 months ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.