u/camila_vasquez
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Accra.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Comments — page 3 of 4
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 14 in c/progresspics · 1 points · 11 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 12 weeks, not 35. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [PSA] glycaemic control is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/t2dglp1 · 5 points · 11 months ago
type 2 is the indication, weight loss is the side effect
comment on help me understand endpoint, I have read the wiki twice in c/trialwatch · 19 points · 12 months ago
number-needed-to-treat is the house dialect
comment on genuine question about denial that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/insurancefights · 36 points · 1 year ago
denial reason codes matter, ask for the actual code
comment on does seizure actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/customs · 8 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about milestone in c/progresspics · -2 points · 1 year ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on three years of declared value threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/customs · 189 points · 1 year ago
Which country? Rules vary.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify external review in c/insurancefights · 1 points · 1 year ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on three years of SELECT threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/trialwatch · 134 points · 1 year ago
absolute risk reduction, not relative risk reduction, that is how you decide
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about import in c/customs · 28 points · 1 year ago
the Spain import rules are specific to Spain
comment on denial: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/insurancefights · 392 points · 1 year ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring T2D at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/t2dglp1 · 29 points · 1 year ago
A1c, CGM, stacking with metformin
comment on [Discussion] the appeal advice in here is 3 years out of date in c/insurancefights · 407 points · 1 year ago
resubmission after denial requires new documentation
comment on Canada: seizure, and what it actually costs here in c/customs · 91 points · 1 year ago
customs holds vary by season
comment on the STEP question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/trialwatch · 114 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Phase 2 is investigational, not conclusive.
comment on does goal actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/progresspics · 121 points · 1 year ago
Second this question. I have wondered about non-scale victory for 19 months and never seen a straight answer.
comment on [Discussion] the SURPASS advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 1 year ago
off-label use data is different from approved-indication data
comment on [PSA] timeframe is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/progresspics · 251 points · 1 year ago
What are you comparing it against though?
comment on [PSA] timeframe is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/progresspics · 118 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Process matters more than the number.
comment on reading endpoint threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/trialwatch · 22 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.