u/britt_zamora
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Gdańsk.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
comment on [Caution] research use only means research use only in c/researchpeptides · 74 points · 13 days ago
Slight fix: the number was 94.2, not 95.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on why do people talk about units and mg like they are different things in c/newbiequestions · 1 points · 29 days ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on [Vendor] MKM communication is slow but the material has been fine in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 1 months ago
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
comment on [PSA] a discount code in a first comment is an instant ban and here is why in c/scamalerts · 12 points · 1 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on help me understand thymosin, I have read the wiki twice in c/researchpeptides · 2 points · 2 months ago
the thymosin literature is thin on humans
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify TB-500 in c/researchpeptides · 6 points · 2 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on am I the only one who found order records harder than the injections in c/vendorvetting · 83 points · 2 months ago
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
comment on the beginner question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/newbiequestions · 40 points · 2 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on testing in c/vendorvetting · 4 points · 3 months ago
the PeptideMeter result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for beginner posts in c/newbiequestions · 5 points · 3 months ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is week one. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on [Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on what is in c/newbiequestions · 40 points · 4 months ago
comment on genuine question about cloned site that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/scamalerts · 11 points · 4 months ago
comment on someone explain exit scam to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/scamalerts · 0 points · 4 months ago
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
comment on small win: fake COA stopped being a problem at week 55 in c/scamalerts · 31 points · 5 months ago
sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions
comment on small win: order records stopped being a problem at week 21 in c/vendorvetting · 27 points · 6 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on small win: order records stopped being a problem at week 21 in c/vendorvetting · 36 points · 6 months ago
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
comment on am I the only one who found TB-500 harder than the injections in c/researchpeptides · 3 points · 8 months ago
name the compound precisely, TB-500 and Thymosin Beta-4 are not the same
comment on am I the only one who found TB-500 harder than the injections in c/researchpeptides · 154 points · 8 months ago
the thymosin literature is thin on humans
comment on does PeptideMeter actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/vendorvetting · 5 points · 8 months ago
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about Medutest in c/vendorvetting · 391 points · 9 months ago
Sceptical.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.