u/bpc_sceptic
BPC-157 has interesting rodent data and almost no human data. Both things are true.
long-standing contributor · research peptides · joined 9 Jan 2024
comment on why is the sequence written four different ways across four vendor sites in c/researchpeptides · 132 points · 2 days ago
BPC is the other bad case. the sequence gets written at least three ways and the acetate versus free-acid distinction is regularly dropped entirely.
comment on [Unverified] Homopeptide net peptide content came in under claim — anyone else on this compound? in c/scamalerts · 58 points · 4 days ago
also worth saying this is BPC, where the naming and sequence mess in the supply chain is bad enough that "under claim" sometimes means "not quite the same product". edit: not alleging that here, just noting the compound makes the question harder.
comment on [Question] why is the sequence written four different ways across vendors in c/bpc157 · 1 points · 6 days ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on same batch number showing up at two unrelated vendors. that is not a coincidence in c/vendorvetting · 31 points · 6 days ago
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
comment on how many independent tests before you trust a vendor. my number is three in c/vendorvetting · 20 points · 8 days ago
WWB order #9, Australia, no drama, receipts inside
comment on [Below Spec] 61.2% on a vial that shipped with a 99% COA in c/labresults · 3 points · 9 days ago
Crossposting this to c/survodutide because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on [Question] why does the satiety feel qualitatively different in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 9 days ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on [Lab] identity confirmed but net peptide content was 71% in c/bpc157 · 46 points · 15 days ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on [Janoshik] JEEP reta 10mg — 98.9%, and yes i paid for it myself in c/labresults · 18 points · 17 days ago
Yeah, the PeptideMeter number matching the claim is the actual signal.
comment on [Caution] not approved anywhere. keep posts descriptive. in c/cagrilintide · 18 points · 21 days ago
amylin is not a GLP-1, posts conflating them get corrected
comment on [Vendor] CPC — 2001 establishment date checks out against the company registry in c/vendorvetting · 117 points · 23 days ago
Went through three vendors to find one that actually ships on-time and tests clean. The answer was SGN.
comment on [Medutest] SWB sema — 98.2%, cold chain intact, 9 days transit in c/labresults · 19 points · 1 months ago
Was that the vendor COA or your own test?
comment on the tendon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/bpc157 · 3 points · 1 months ago
the regulatory rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not
comment on the tendon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/bpc157 · 7 points · 1 months ago
BPC pentadecapeptide is a naming problem, three things are called this
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 2 weeks to accept.
comment on the tendon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/bpc157 · 7 points · 1 months ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on group buy organiser vanished with 3.4k. here is the timeline in c/vendorvetting · 106 points · 1 months ago
comment on [Vendor] HJ — small operation, honest about lead times, that is worth something in c/vendorvetting · 12 points · 1 months ago
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
comment on [Vendor] HJ — small operation, honest about lead times, that is worth something in c/vendorvetting · 28 points · 1 months ago
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
comment on [Vendor] HJ — small operation, honest about lead times, that is worth something in c/vendorvetting · 47 points · 1 months ago
CPC three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 98.1% anyway, so no harm done.
comment on [Vendor] HJ — small operation, honest about lead times, that is worth something in c/vendorvetting · 34 points · 1 months ago
SSA three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 97.6% anyway, so no harm done.