286
[Discussion] the PDF metadata advice in here is 17 years out of date
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 7.5mg, week 77, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable —…
u/bianca_demir
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Salvador.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
352post karma
3,892comment karma
1submissions
29comments
Overview — page 2 of 2
comment on stalled for 7 weeks at 0.25mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/t2dglp1 · 75 points · 1 year ago
the weight-loss conversation drowns out glycaemic control sometimes
comment on [Discussion] the PDF metadata advice in here is 17 years out of date in c/scamalerts · 6 points · 1 year ago
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #21 — France, 39 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/labresults · 34 points · 1 year ago
sample of one, say so
comment on fraud: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/scamalerts · 5 points · 2 years ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with fake COA, not with what you concluded.
comment on fraud: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/scamalerts · 3 points · 2 years ago
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
comment on stalled for 21 weeks at 7.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/scamalerts · 1.4k points · 2 years ago
the VendorInvestigate number or it did not happen
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about cloned site in c/scamalerts · 8 points · 2 years ago
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
comment on does test results actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/labresults · 69 points · 2 years ago
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
comment on why does nobody talk about batch in c/labresults · 31 points · 2 years ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.