u/batch_number_bertie
Same batch number on two different vendors means one thing and it is not good.
long-standing contributor · vetting · joined 24 Oct 2023
Comments — page 2 of 5
comment on small win: units stopped being a problem at week 11 in c/reconstitution · 130 points · 3 months ago
i am begging people to write down the concentration
comment on VendorInvestigate: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/vendorvetting · 101 points · 3 months ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
comment on ATTAIN — 3 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/orforglipron · 101 points · 3 months ago
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for reship posts in c/vendorvetting · 36 points · 3 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on [Question] units — what am I missing here in c/reconstitution · -37 points · 3 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on my triglycerides moved and I cannot work out whether small molecule is why in c/orforglipron · 42 points · 3 months ago
the supply conversation changes if this approves
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring Janoshik at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 98 points · 4 months ago
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for small molecule posts in c/orforglipron · 127 points · 4 months ago
the absorption problem is solved by non-peptide structure
comment on why does nobody talk about testing in c/vendorvetting · 300 points · 4 months ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on 5 months in and Medutest is still the thing I get wrong in c/vendorvetting · 71 points · 5 months ago
Is that a VendorInvestigate result or are you quoting the vendor COA?
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about secretagogue in c/researchpeptides · 115 points · 5 months ago
name the compound precisely, TB-500 and Thymosin Beta-4 are not the same
comment on week 31 check-in — 6kg down, constipation manageable, one thing confusing me in c/bpc157 · 1 points · 5 months ago
This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring vendor at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 45 points · 5 months ago
the reship rate on QST is actually pretty consistent
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring vendor at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 138 points · 5 months ago
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
comment on anyone else notice concentration kicking in around week 40 in c/reconstitution · 13 points · 5 months ago
more water means more units for the same dose, which means finer resolution
comment on someone explain research peptides to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/researchpeptides · 13 points · 5 months ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with thymosin, not with what you concluded.
comment on [Discussion] order records is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/vendorvetting · 2 points · 5 months ago
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
comment on [Discussion] order records is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/vendorvetting · 13 points · 5 months ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on am I the only one who found testing harder than the injections in c/vendorvetting · 260 points · 6 months ago
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
comment on [PSA] Medutest is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/vendorvetting · 20 points · 6 months ago
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?