u/bastian_aalto
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Kaunas.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Comments — page 2 of 4
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about research peptides until somebody posts a number in c/researchpeptides · 1 points · 2 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on switched from 15mg to 12.5mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/vendorvetting · 59 points · 2 months ago
Not to be pedantic but Janoshik and order records are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on someone explain thymosin to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/researchpeptides · 38 points · 3 months ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #2 — Canada, 17 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/researchpeptides · 242 points · 3 months ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on [Results] 22 weeks, 45kg, and maintenance was the hard part in c/maintenancephase · 323 points · 3 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on testing in c/vendorvetting · 5 points · 3 months ago
First order from TFC was great, second one had a different batch and tested lower. The vendor retested and credited me. Logged it here.
comment on week 86 check-in — 26kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/glp1women · 1 points · 4 months ago
no cycle-tracking data with identifying details
comment on goal weight is the most under-discussed thing in c/coldchain in c/maintenancephase · 26 points · 6 months ago
Maintenance for 10 months now. 5mg every 17 days, weight 13±10kg. Found the rhythm.
comment on [Results] 22 weeks, 16kg, and goal was the hard part in c/progresspics · 74 points · 7 months ago
comment on reading Janoshik threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/vendorvetting · 53 points · 7 months ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on 6 months in and fertility is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1women · 1 points · 7 months ago
cycle changes are real and under-researched
comment on [Question] insulin resistance — what am I missing here in c/glp1women · 4 points · 7 months ago
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify lowest effective dose in c/maintenancephase · 15 points · 10 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on week 81 check-in — 12kg down, injection-site soreness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/coa · 1 points · 11 months ago
the batch number or it did not happen
comment on [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 67 points · 11 months ago
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
comment on [PSA] COA is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/coa · 166 points · 1 year ago
the related substances line is where the story is
comment on [Results] 61 weeks on 0.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/progresspics · 66 points · 1 year ago
comment on my eGFR moved and I cannot work out whether regain is why in c/maintenancephase · -20 points · 1 year ago
Weight variance within what range?
comment on three years of certificate of analysis threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coa · 94 points · 1 year ago
Are you looking at area% or net peptide content? Different numbers.
comment on related substances is the most under-discussed thing in c/scamalerts in c/coa · 3 points · 1 year ago
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details