u/baseline_drifter
If your baseline wanders, your integration lies.
member · analytical · joined 2 Feb 2024
Comments — page 2 of 5
comment on TRIUMPH: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · 21 points · 1 months ago
The glucagon component does different things than dual agonism. The nausea are not just amplified versions.
comment on TRIUMPH: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · 58 points · 1 months ago
retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for seizure posts in c/customs · 55 points · 1 months ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on France: nausea, and what it actually costs here in c/sideeffects · 34 points · 1 months ago
Same experience. Week 78 and it simply stopped. I know that is not useful information but it is what happened.
comment on France: nausea, and what it actually costs here in c/sideeffects · 171 points · 1 months ago
sulphur burps are disgusting but not dangerous, 12 weeks and they stopped
comment on [Vendor] QST order #13 — Denmark, 39 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/sideeffects · 44 points · 2 months ago
resting heart rate moved up 19 bpm and settled back down when I stopped escalating
comment on unpopular opinion: seizure is massively overrated in c/customs · 32 points · 2 months ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is jurisdiction. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on unpopular opinion: method development is massively overrated in c/hplc · 9 points · 2 months ago
Strongly agree.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on declared value: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/customs · 1 points · 2 months ago
research-use documentation is not a magic word
comment on stalled for 19 weeks at 0.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/glp1muscle · 1 points · 2 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on [Results] 92 weeks, 15kg, and BPC-157 was the hard part in c/bpc157 · 15 points · 2 months ago
pentadecapeptide is BPC-157, the supply chain naming is a mess
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 0.5mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/hplc · 68 points · 3 months ago
related substances are where the story lives, not the main peak
comment on [Results] 12 weeks, 35kg, and glucagon was the hard part in c/retatrutide · 492 points · 3 months ago
TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 96.2% weight loss but the sulphur burps profile on the highest arm was rough. Phase 2 != phase 3.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring reflux at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/sideeffects · 170 points · 3 months ago
early fullness at 1.0mg is different from 0.25mg
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify A1c in c/t2dglp1 · 26 points · 4 months ago
Strongly agree.
Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 95.1% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Question] import — what am I missing here in c/customs · 10 points · 4 months ago
research-use documentation is not a magic word
comment on heart rate: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/sideeffects · 18 points · 4 months ago
This is correct. The early fullness is horrible for three weeks and then just ends.
comment on someone explain hair loss to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/sideeffects · 9 points · 5 months ago
My sulphur burps was worst at 0.25mg and better at 0.5mg, which makes no sense but it is real.
comment on someone explain hair loss to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/sideeffects · 31 points · 5 months ago
Went to A&E convinced it was pancreatitis. Lipase normal. It was gallstones. Get checked, do not post and wait.
comment on someone explain hair loss to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/sideeffects · 16 points · 5 months ago
Yeah, the sulphur burps hit on day 8 for me too, not day 1.