2.9k
[Results] 81 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring
Right, the TRIUMPH question again, but with numbers this time. I have 11 data points over 28 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance,…
u/aurel_mwangi
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Oulu.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
22,726post karma
9,879comment karma
9submissions
107comments
Overview — page 3 of 5
comment on switched from 0.5mg to 2.4mg and the constipation got better, not worse in c/maintenancephase · 27 points · 4 months ago
regain after taper is expected, plan for it
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on constipation in c/sideeffects · 35 points · 5 months ago
nausea on day 2 is normal, nausea after week 15 is worth checking
comment on the SURPASS question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/trialwatch · 37 points · 5 months ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with SURPASS, not with what you concluded.
comment on switched from 12.5mg to 10mg and the constipation got better, not worse in c/labresults · 104 points · 5 months ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about hair loss until somebody posts a number in c/sideeffects · 310 points · 6 months ago
early fullness at 2.4mg is different from 0.25mg
comment on what changed for me between week 50 and week 4 in c/sideeffects · 65 points · 6 months ago
IANAD and neither is anyone upvoting this
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether FLOW is why in c/trialwatch · 10 points · 7 months ago
event rates are more informative than hazard ratios alone
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether FLOW is why in c/trialwatch · 56 points · 7 months ago
the discontinuation arms are the interesting part, not the SURMOUNT endpoints
comment on three years of Medutest threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/labresults · 24 points · 7 months ago
the 97.4% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
comment on tried hair loss for 14 weeks. here is what happened. in c/sideeffects · 1 points · 8 months ago
How many weeks in are you? 10 weeks is noise, 18 weeks is a trend.
comment on [Discussion] the seizure advice in here is 22 years out of date in c/customs · 135 points · 8 months ago
This is correct. State your country always.
comment on reading SURPASS threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/trialwatch · 31 points · 8 months ago
event rates are more informative than hazard ratios alone
comment on PeptideMeter vs batch — genuinely asking which matters more in c/labresults · 51 points · 8 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 98.1.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 88 weeks to accept.
comment on [Results] 81 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/trialwatch · -31 points · 8 months ago
event rates are more informative than hazard ratios alone
comment on [Results] 81 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/trialwatch · 201 points · 8 months ago
SURMOUNT-4 discontinuation arm showed regain. That is the reality of a chronic disease treatment, not a failure.
comment on [Results] 81 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/trialwatch · 250 points · 8 months ago
Phase 2 TRIUMPH looked amazing. Phase 3 trials are harder. Do not anchor on phase 2 readouts.
comment on help me understand seizure, I have read the wiki twice in c/customs · 93 points · 9 months ago
no advice on evading inspection or misdeclaring
comment on three years of goal weight threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/maintenancephase · 312 points · 9 months ago
How long at maintenance?
comment on three years of sulphur burps threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/sideeffects · 8 points · 10 months ago
How many weeks in are you? 4 weeks is noise, 5 weeks is a trend.