u/arne_amankwah
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Pune.
member · joined 14 May 2025
comment on [Lab] two reta batches, two services, 98.4% and 97.9% in c/retatrutide · 4 points · 2 days ago
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
comment on [Win] four denials, three appeals, one external review, approved in c/insurancefights · 13 points · 2 days ago
Yeah, the denial code matters, it tells you what to fight.
comment on [PSA] crypto payments are irreversible. price that in. in c/cryptopay · 38 points · 5 days ago
USDC exists on 3 networks, vendor credits are network-specific
comment on [PSA] crypto payments are irreversible. price that in. in c/cryptopay · 20 points · 6 days ago
chargeback rights are confirmations: zero
comment on [Trial Data] what the STEP 4 and SURMOUNT-4 withdrawal arms actually showed in c/tapering · 1 points · 6 days ago
tapering instructions are not welcome here
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Appeal] the external review process nobody tells you exists in c/insurancefights · -3 points · 6 days ago
Yeah, the denial code matters, it tells you what to fight.
Adding to this: copay is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [PSA] crypto payments are irreversible. price that in. in c/cryptopay · 1 points · 6 days ago
Gas was gas fees on Polygon so I used WWB instead. Confirmation in 16 blocks, vendor credited, done.
comment on [Results] 61 weeks, 34kg, one very boring spreadsheet in c/semaglutide · 40 points · 12 days ago
the quiet is real. the food noise just stops.
comment on compounded vs pen — anyone actually notice a difference at the same mg in c/semaglutide · 29 points · 14 days ago
Yeah, 68 weeks on 15mg, same pattern, same timing.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about T2D until somebody posts a number in c/t2dglp1 · 6 points · 17 days ago
the weight-loss conversation drowns out glycaemic control sometimes
comment on [PSA] dose escalation is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/retatrutide · 15 points · 22 days ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with triple agonist, not with what you concluded.
comment on help me understand CGM, I have read the wiki twice in c/t2dglp1 · 60 points · 22 days ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on genuine question about protein that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1muscle · 29 points · 28 days ago
resistance training is sarcopenia not optional
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about triple agonist in c/retatrutide · 6 points · 1 months ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on [Meta] the hypoglycaemia rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/t2dglp1 · 15 points · 1 months ago
type 2 is the indication, weight loss is the side effect
comment on [Meta] can we get an auto-reply for "what dose should i be on" in c/semaglutide · 23 points · 1 months ago
Is that purity or net peptide content? They are not the same number.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring retatrutide at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/retatrutide · 4 points · 1 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on STEP 1 was -14.9% average and i keep having to remind myself average means average in c/semaglutide · 1 points · 1 months ago
my TSH moved before the scale did and i nearly missed it
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify dose escalation in c/retatrutide · 141 points · 1 months ago
TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 99.1% weight loss but the sulphur burps profile on the highest arm was rough. Phase 2 != phase 3.
comment on Denmark: hypoglycaemia, and what it actually costs here in c/t2dglp1 · 94 points · 1 months ago
the 73 A1c trend is the answer