u/analog_alphabet
Every new three-letter analog needs a data table before it needs a hype thread.
member · joined 4 Mar 2025
Comments — page 2 of 4
comment on someone explain thymosin to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/researchpeptides · 10 points · 3 months ago
Has anyone actually got this in writing, or is it forum lore at this point?
comment on someone explain thymosin to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/researchpeptides · 13 points · 3 months ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #2 — Canada, 17 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/researchpeptides · 84 points · 3 months ago
focus on identity verification, handling, evidence state
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for pharmacology posts in c/glp1science · 7 points · 3 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on someone explain identity to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/researchpeptides · 24 points · 3 months ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on unpopular opinion: gastric emptying is massively overrated in c/glp1science · 12 points · 4 months ago
amylin is not GLP-1, posts conflating them get corrected
comment on milestone is the most under-discussed thing in c/bloodwork in c/progresspics · 1 points · 5 months ago
text removes the body-shaming pile-on
Disagree on that part. 99.0% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on milestone is the most under-discussed thing in c/bloodwork in c/progresspics · 1 points · 5 months ago
This is correct. Process matters more than the number.
comment on milestone is the most under-discussed thing in c/bloodwork in c/progresspics · 24 points · 5 months ago
starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history
comment on the half-life question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/glp1science · 187 points · 5 months ago
comment on anyone else notice progress kicking in around week 89 in c/progresspics · -14 points · 6 months ago
What was the batch number and which service?
comment on three years of ranking threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/meta · 27 points · 9 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on three years of ranking threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/meta · 23 points · 9 months ago
Strongly agree. Transparency wins.
comment on the timeframe thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/progresspics · 1 points · 10 months ago
the milestone milestone is worth posting
comment on switched from 0.25mg to 15mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/researchpeptides · 9 points · 11 months ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on reading identity threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/researchpeptides · -3 points · 1 year ago
purity and identity are two questions
comment on reading identity threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/researchpeptides · 64 points · 1 year ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on [Discussion] the research peptides advice in here is 5 years out of date in c/researchpeptides · 7 points · 1 year ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on [Discussion] the research peptides advice in here is 5 years out of date in c/researchpeptides · 30 points · 1 year ago
Came off after 85 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on secretagogue in c/researchpeptides · 56 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, identity is the first question.