u/aleksi_lehtinen

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

Adding to this: heart rate is doing more work than the comment implies.

Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.

severe abdominal pain is an urgent-care question, not a forum question

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

Yeah, the incretin mechanism is doing the work here.

cite the paper: journal, year, first author, links optional

state how long you have been at maintenance, week 8 is not maintenance

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

u-100 syringe, not u-40, or your math is off by factor of 11

GGPeps took 6 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.

the regain is treatment of chronic condition ending, not failure

the 9 week discontinuation arm is the data

Yeah, the early fullness hit on day 9 for me too, not day 1.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 45 weeks to accept.

the plateau is where the learning happens

Slight fix: the number was 99.1, not 99.0. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

appetite return timelines vary appetite return

regain on taper is expected, plan for it

resting heart rate moved up 21 bpm and settled back down when I stopped escalating