1.7k
someone explain regain to me like I have not read a paper in years
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/bloodwork repeats that interval stretching is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and…
u/adaeze_weiss
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Rosario.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
14,742post karma
4,671comment karma
9submissions
67comments
Overview — page 2 of 4
comment on someone explain FLOW to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 3 months ago
event rates are more informative than hazard ratios alone
comment on endpoint — my 2-week log, condensed into one table in c/trialwatch · 36 points · 3 months ago
absolute risk reduction, not relative risk reduction, that is how you decide
comment on three years of packaging threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coldchain · 182 points · 4 months ago
Logger trace from my shipment: 10 hours at 4°C. Powder tested 96.8% against 94.2% claim. Tolerates more than the box implies.
comment on interval stretching is the most under-discussed thing in c/compounding in c/tapering · 9 points · 4 months ago
Strongly agree. The regain is expected.
comment on week 76 check-in — 31kg down, muscle cramps manageable, one thing confusing me in c/tapering · 21 points · 5 months ago
the regain is treatment of chronic condition ending, not failure
comment on small win: SURMOUNT stopped being a problem at week 65 in c/trialwatch · 13 points · 5 months ago
press release hazard ratio posts must be flaired until a publication exists
comment on the SURPASS question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/trialwatch · 111 points · 5 months ago
the 22 week readout is different from the 39 week readout
comment on week 41 check-in — 21kg down, injection-site soreness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/insurancefights · 36 points · 6 months ago
step therapy documentation is the weapon, use it
comment on switched from 7.5mg to 15mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/insurancefights · 1 points · 7 months ago
Strongly agree. Step therapy is predictable if you have the criteria.
comment on tried STEP for 14 weeks. here is what happened. in c/trialwatch · 109 points · 7 months ago
Strongly agree. Phase 2 is investigational, not conclusive.
comment on reading SURPASS threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/trialwatch · 23 points · 8 months ago
SELECT reported a TRIUMPH hazard ratio but the absolute event rate is what changes clinical practice.
comment on reading SURPASS threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/trialwatch · 44 points · 8 months ago
the relative risk reduction in headlines is not the whole story
comment on discontinuation: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/tapering · 55 points · 9 months ago
The nausea was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on discontinuation: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/tapering · 45 points · 9 months ago
appetite return timelines vary regain
comment on three years of data logger threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coldchain · 41 points · 10 months ago
genuine question, not being difficult: how do you know
comment on week 91 check-in — 37kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/trialwatch · 2 points · 10 months ago
the 14 week readout is different from the 16 week readout
comment on the formulary thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/insurancefights · 83 points · 11 months ago
resubmission after denial requires new documentation
comment on does packaging actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/coldchain · 35 points · 11 months ago
This is correct. Dry powder is way more robust than liquid.
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether interval stretching is why in c/tapering · 12 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, regain is not a failure.