u/aa_analysis_andy
Amino acid analysis is the boring test that catches the interesting frauds.
member · joined 14 Jul 2024
Overview — page 2 of 5
comment on [PSA] dose escalation is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/retatrutide · 65 points · 22 days ago
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether glucagon is why in c/retatrutide · 24 points · 25 days ago
Removed a chain here.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on why does nobody talk about TRIUMPH in c/retatrutide · 2 points · 27 days ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on the phase 2 question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 106 points · 28 days ago
triple agonism is phase 2, do not generalise
comment on anyone else notice research peptides kicking in around week 9 in c/researchpeptides · 56 points · 1 months ago
the 9-letter analogs are speculative
comment on three years of gastric emptying threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1science · 11 points · 1 months ago
comment on stalled for 14 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/sideeffects · 19 points · 1 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about triple agonist in c/retatrutide · 2 points · 1 months ago
triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual
comment on [Confirmed] site copied our own wiki text word for word to look legitimate in c/scamalerts · 35 points · 1 months ago
evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test
comment on anyone else notice gallbladder kicking in around week 39 in c/sideeffects · 1 points · 1 months ago
Strongly agree. Describe your dose, your week number, and your titration speed or nobody can help.
comment on TRIUMPH: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · 87 points · 1 months ago
retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions
comment on [Results] 26 weeks on 15mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/glp1eu · 30 points · 1 months ago
Yeah, EU rules is usually national rules.
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether identity is why in c/researchpeptides · 37 points · 1 months ago
Yeah, identity is the first question.
comment on France: nausea, and what it actually costs here in c/sideeffects · 64 points · 1 months ago
ask your actual doctor, not us
comment on the cloned site question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/scamalerts · 50 points · 1 months ago
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
comment on tried CagriSema for 2 weeks. here is what happened. in c/cagrilintide · 5 points · 2 months ago
CagriSema ratios in trials are fixed, do not extrapolate self-mixing
comment on cloned site vs fake COA — genuinely asking which matters more in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 2 months ago
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
comment on [Meta] the retatrutide rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 2 months ago
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
comment on phase 2 vs triple agonist — genuinely asking which matters more in c/retatrutide · 59 points · 2 months ago
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
comment on cloned site is the most under-discussed thing in c/hplc in c/scamalerts · 50 points · 2 months ago
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 56 weeks to accept.