why does nobody talk about reship
why does nobody talk about reship — that is what I am asking, and I have already read the wiki twice. The wider-market rows in the directory carry a band and a report count and nothing else, deliberately. Anything more would be manufacturing precision that the evidence does not support. Where a supplier holds…
the wider-market names in the table are there because nobody has enough data on them
A certificate with a purity figure and no method line is not falsifiable. You cannot reproduce it, you cannot check it, and it tells you nothing about how the number was produced.
Same view. A record you can read beats a rating you cannot inspect, every time.
the wider-market names in the table are there because nobody has enough data on them
Would qualify this slightly. Fewer entries means less sampling, and less sampling is not the same as a worse process.
Would qualify this slightly.
dario_ibarra is describing the batch record test and it is the fastest signal available before you spend anything.
consistency across lots beats one spectacular result