GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of how much of what we believe about Medutest actually comes from PeptideMeter threads — 26 comments in the full submission. View in context.
679
c/vendorvetting·submitted 1 year ago by u/tl_dr_tina

how much of what we believe about Medutest actually comes from PeptideMeter threads

Resolvedbranch of 7 comments

The title is the whole question — how much of what we believe about Medutest actually comes from PeptideMeter threads — but here is why I am asking. The thing that decided it for me was that SGN answered a column-and-gradient question in writing without asking why I wanted to know. Started buying small deliberately,…

Read the full submission and all 26 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 1 year ago
u/batch_number_bertieMOD104 points·1 year ago

Left up. It names an operation, it carries a date and a lot, and it is written as a report rather than an accusation.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_almeida29 points·1 year ago

Independent testing is worth more than a supplied certificate for one structural reason: the chain of custody. A member who buys, ships and pays is testing the same thing you would receive.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kaia_cabrera129 points·1 year ago

a claim with no batch number is a marketing document

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (4) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/vendorvetting
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/receipts_or_nothingu/paper_trail_paulau/batch_number_bertieu/janoshik_junkie
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →