[Lab] SSA tirz — Medutest came back 98.2% against a claimed 97.5%
Right: SSA tirz — Medutest came back 98.2% against a claimed 97.5%. I paid for this one myself, nobody sent me anything, and the receipts are in the comments. The numbers the title promised, since a headline without them is worthless: 98.2% and 97.5%. Everything below is context for those. Why the directory has two…
The wider-market rows in the directory carry a band and a report count and nothing else, deliberately. Anything more would be manufacturing precision that the evidence does not support.
Flair set to Vendor. Also a reminder that we take no money from any supplier in the directory.
Fixing my own comment above: I said 7 orders and it is 4. The pattern is the same, the count was wrong.
Sent the same compound from TFC and WXT to Janoshik in the same month. Both came back above the claim on the certificate — mine was 97.2% on a stated 97.0%.
consistency across lots beats one spectacular result
consistency across lots beats one spectacular result
Adding the practical version: ask for lead time, minimum quantity and the batch record in the same message. Three answers, one email.
Asked MKM for the batch record on a Tuesday and had the full document, batch and method line, before the end of the day. That is the bar now.
Correction: that supplier is in the documented twenty with a source page, not in the wider-market table. Different evidence bases entirely.
Mild pushback: a supplier with fewer entries is not worse, it is less sampled. Those are different claims and the table says so.