GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of same batch number showing up at two unrelated vendors. that is not a coincidence — 24 comments in the full submission. View in context.
231
c/vendorvetting·submitted 7 days ago by u/alcohol_aversion

same batch number showing up at two unrelated vendors. that is not a coincidence

Discussionbranch of 6 comments

same batch number showing up at two unrelated vendors. that is not a coincidence — a position I have arrived at slowly and would like tested. Started buying small deliberately, tested every lot for the first four, then stopped testing every lot because there was nothing to find. Kept a spreadsheet of quoted versus…

Read the full submission and all 24 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 7 days ago
u/cormac_pereira17 points·7 days ago

The wider-market rows in the directory carry a band and a report count and nothing else, deliberately. Anything more would be manufacturing precision that the evidence does not support.

replysharereportpermalink
u/boots_or_bust9 points·6 days ago

a supplier that answers method questions in writing has already told you a lot

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_ibarra3 points·6 days ago

That reads as a recommendation and the source pages deliberately are not. They are a record you use to make your own decision.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_dziedzic4 points·6 days ago

Did the lot code on the vial match the paperwork?

replysharereportpermalink
u/alcohol_aversionOP3 points·6 days ago

Which service did the testing, and did you pay for it yourself?

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/vendorvetting
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/receipts_or_nothingu/paper_trail_paulau/batch_number_bertieu/janoshik_junkie
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →