same batch number showing up at two unrelated vendors. that is not a coincidence
Right, the testing question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 17 data points over 36 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 14, not week 63. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
Reship experience: SGN asked for photos, processed it in 4 days, sent a replacement no questions. That is the template.
the VendorInvestigate result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
the reship rate on FGP is actually pretty consistent
- 1Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.4 comments in this branch · started by u/kaia_cabrera