GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Vendor] MKM — five tests, four compounds, nothing outside the band — 41 comments in the full submission. View in context.
996
c/vendorvetting·submitted 1 months ago by u/liv_dumitru

[Vendor] MKM — five tests, four compounds, nothing outside the band

Vendorbranch of 8 comments

MKM — five tests, four compounds, nothing outside the band. If anybody has the same lane and a different experience I would genuinely like to see it next to mine. A certificate with a purity figure and no method line is not falsifiable. You cannot reproduce it, you cannot check it, and it tells you nothing about how…

Read the full submission and all 41 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 1 months ago
u/janoshik_junkieindependent tester61 points·1 months ago

what does the certificate actually carry — that is the whole question

replysharereportpermalink
u/ruben_brandt19 points·1 months ago

This. Ask for the batch record. The ones who send it inside a day have told you more than any review could.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lane_map_larrylogistics38 points·1 months ago

That is a report count, not a test count. The table lists both and they are very different numbers.

replysharereportpermalink
u/valeria_cardoso11 points·1 months ago

the wider-market names in the table are there because nobody has enough data on them

replysharereportpermalink
u/fibre_forward7 points·1 months ago

Which service did the testing, and did you pay for it yourself?

replysharereportpermalink
u/teodor_lokken2 points·1 months ago

Started buying small deliberately, tested every lot for the first four, then stopped testing every lot because there was nothing to find.

replysharereportpermalink
u/elin_ferrari1 point·1 months ago

Did the lot code on the vial match the paperwork?

replysharereportpermalink
u/liv_dumitruOP46 points·1 months ago

a claim with no batch number is a marketing document

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.