GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] split one vial across Janoshik and Medutest — 98.1% and 98.9% — 59 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.6k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 4 months ago by u/greta_lokken

[Lab] split one vial across Janoshik and Medutest — 98.1% and 98.9%

Labbranch of 9 comments

split one vial across Janoshik and Medutest — 98.1% and 98.9%. One vial, one service, one member paying, which is the only kind of result this board should treat as evidence. The numbers the title promised, since a headline without them is worthless: 98.1% and 98.9%. Everything below is context for those. Independent…

Read the full submission and all 59 comments →

This branch

9 comments, started 4 months ago
u/column_dead_volume77 points·4 months ago

Yes, and the reason the wider-market table has no scores is that a score built on two reports would be a lie with a decimal point.

replysharereportpermalink
u/teodor_lokken0 points·4 months ago

Where a supplier holds regional stock, ask which lines are actually held there rather than drop-shipped. It changes the lead time and it changes the customs question.

replysharereportpermalink
u/matias_falk21 points·4 months ago

How many separate lots is that across? One lot tested twice is one data point.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gustav_vermeulen8 points·4 months ago

That is a report count, not a test count. The table lists both and they are very different numbers.

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_lokkenOP4 points·4 months ago

Fixing my own comment above: I said 18 orders and it is 35. The pattern is the same, the count was wrong.

replysharereportpermalink
u/column_dead_volume7 points·4 months ago

lead time quoted at checkout is the number to hold them to

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]5 points·4 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/elin_ferrari6 points·4 months ago

the wider-market names in the table are there because nobody has enough data on them

replysharereportpermalink
u/receipts_or_nothingMOD55 points·4 months ago·edited

Left up. It names an operation, it carries a date and a lot, and it is written as a report rather than an accusation.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.