does PeptideMeter actually matter or is it forum lore at this point
Genuine question, and the title is the question: does PeptideMeter actually matter or is it forum lore at this point. Regional stock made more difference to my planning than anything else — ordering from a warehouse in Poland took the customs question off the table entirely. The thing that decided it for me was that…
Sent the same compound from HJ and SSA to VendorInvestigate in the same month. Both came back above the claim on the certificate — mine was 98.5% on a stated 98.0%.
Tracking number redacted from the post above. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Why the directory has two tiers, since the question comes up whenever somebody new finds it.
Twenty suppliers have enough independent results, over enough separate lots, over enough time, that the log says something. Those get a page, a test table and a link to their own storefront so you can compare their claims with the record.
The rest — nearly two hundred names — get a row, a band and a report count. Not because they are bad, but because two results is an anecdote about a vial. Manufacturing a score out of that would make the whole directory worthless, and the contrast is the point.
Same view. A record you can read beats a rating you cannot inspect, every time.
What did they say when you asked for the method line?
Hangzhou Meite Bio came up in three threads the week I was ordering and I could not find a single independent result for them anywhere. Went with a documented supplier instead.