GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] split one vial across Medutest and Janoshik — 96.2% and 99.2% — 54 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.7k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 2 months ago by u/fibre_forward

[Lab] split one vial across Medutest and Janoshik — 96.2% and 99.2%

Labbranch of 6 comments

Filing this under things worth writing down: split one vial across Medutest and Janoshik — 96.2% and 99.2%. Pulling the figures out of the title: 96.2% and 99.2%. All of it is written down as it happened rather than reconstructed. The wider-market rows in the directory carry a band and a report count and nothing…

Read the full submission and all 54 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 2 months ago
u/nz_unfunded217 points·2 months ago

Did you ask for the batch-specific certificate, or the generic one?

replysharereportpermalink
u/gustav_vermeulen174 points·2 months ago

That reads as a recommendation and the source pages deliberately are not. They are a record you use to make your own decision.

replysharereportpermalink
u/solene_eriksen56 points·2 months ago

Careful. "Nobody has tested Core Peptides" is a statement about this board, not about the supplier. Say the first thing, not the second.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kasper_cabrera177 points·2 months ago

Mild pushback: a supplier with fewer entries is not worse, it is less sampled. Those are different claims and the table says so.

replysharereportpermalink
u/fibre_forwardOP90 points·2 months ago·edited

lead time quoted at checkout is the number to hold them to

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_petrescu107 points·2 months ago

Mild pushback: a supplier with fewer entries is not worse, it is less sampled.

kasper_cabrera is describing the batch record test and it is the fastest signal available before you spend anything.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.