why does nobody talk about order records
The title is the whole question — why does nobody talk about order records — but here is why I am asking. The thing that decided it for me was that SWB answered a column-and-gradient question in writing without asking why I wanted to know. Started buying small deliberately, tested every lot for the first four, then…
What a batch record should carry: the lot identifier, the date of analysis, the method including column and gradient, the individual related substances rather than a total, and the storage condition the stability statement was written against.
What a batch record should carry: the lot identifier, the date of analysis, the method including column and gradient, the individual related substance
Agreed — and the corollary is that "no data" and "bad data" have to be written differently. The table separates them for exactly that reason.
Right — ERP publishes the method line on the certificate, and once you have seen one that does you notice every one that does not.
Agreed on buying small first. The cost of a test is small next to the cost of committing to a supplier you have not checked.
three independent results beat thirty forum posts
Regional stock made more difference to my planning than anything else — ordering from a warehouse in the Netherlands took the customs question off the table entirely.