someone explain FLOW to me like I have not read a paper in years
someone explain FLOW to me like I have not read a paper in years — that is what I am asking, and I have already read the wiki twice. Started keeping the trial identifiers straight in a note file because I kept mixing up two programmes in the same sentence. Went looking for the registered protocol to see whether the…
This. Intention-to-treat versus completer analysis routinely moves the headline by several points.
Small fix — that was the cardiovascular outcomes trial, so weight was a secondary endpoint and the population was different.
a press release is not a publication
a press release is not a publication
careful_gradient_again is right about the programme names. They are different populations with different endpoints.
a mean is not a promise
the appendix is where the interesting tables live
Compared myself to a trial mean for about six months before realising the trial arm had dietitian contact every fortnight.
Compared myself to a trial mean for about six months before realising the trial arm had dietitian contact every fortnight.
Disagreeing with this line: that is a relative reduction and the absolute numbers are considerably less dramatic.
registry entry, protocol, publication — three different documents
That is the 68-week readout, not the 72-week one. Different trial, different duration.
SELECT was cardiovascular outcomes, not weight