GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
489
c/trialwatch·posted 20 days ago by u/pancreatitis_scare

[Stats] number needed to treat, or i am not interested

Stats Sourced ×4

I have had 15 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.

Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 20 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.

The independent number came back 98.4% against a claimed 98.6%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.

Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.

632 up / 143 down82% upvoted15 commentsid 11pwi810 Jul 2026

15 comments

11 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/slow_logbook_notes30106 points·19 days ago

What was the dropout rate?

replysharereportpermalink
u/laila_almeida86 points·18 days ago

absolute risk reduction, not relative risk reduction, that is how you decide

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]56 points·18 days ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/nils_tulloch24 points·18 days ago

give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body

replysharereportpermalink
u/draw_up_dizzy74 points·19 days ago

Phase 2 TRIUMPH looked amazing. Phase 3 trials are harder. Do not anchor on phase 2 readouts.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hub_opssite staff29 points·19 days ago

the discontinuation arms are the interesting part, not the STEP endpoints

replysharereportpermalink
u/eu_apotheke_a34 points·19 days ago

off-label use data is different from approved-indication data

replysharereportpermalink
u/sofia_wikstrom43 points·20 days ago

off-label use data is different from approved-indication data

replysharereportpermalink
u/trialwatch_theoMOD29 points·20 days ago

Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nikhil_lindqvist20 points·19 days ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yusuf_achebe6 points·19 days ago

phase 2 is not phase 3, smaller n and shorter trial

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/trialwatch

Clinical trial reading group. New readouts, protocol amendments, endpoint definitions, dropout handling, and the difference between a press release and a publication. Absolute risk reduction and number-needed-to-treat are house dialect here.

34kmembers
95submissions
Nov 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/trialwatch rules
  1. Press-release-only posts must be flaired Press Release until a publication exists.
  2. Give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body.
  3. Relative risk reduction alone is not a result. Show the absolute numbers.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.