is the tirz appetite thing actually different or am i imagining it
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: tirzepatide matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 2 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 5 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Hard agree. The food noise disappears differently on the two compounds.
How long at each step before you escalated?
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
Switched from sema at 10mg to tirz at 7.5mg. Different drugs, cannot compare the doses directly.
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
My ApoB moved faster on tirz than on sema at the same timepoint, which matches what people report.